📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT R&W Command of Evidence (Hard) — Drill 22

Drill 22 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 21
Next drill
Drill 23
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions →
Drill 22 — current you are here
Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT R&W Command of Evidence (Hard) — Drill 22 is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Trees move water from soil to leaf against gravity, and these items probe how researchers separate competing explanations for a drought finding. Two of the five are data items -- one bar comparison, one table -- and the rest are finding items that ask which observation decides between rival mechanisms. As always, the trap distractors are true on their own terms but answer a slightly different question than the one posed.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which statement best identifies which species was more drought-sensitive, based on the graph?
  2. Which finding, if true, would most strongly support the embolism explanation over the stomata-closing explanation?
  3. Which result would best fit the prediction that follows from the deep-moisture explanation?
  4. Based on the table, which plot meets both thresholds -- reliable moisture within root reach and a canopy closed enough to limit heat stress?
  5. Which finding, if true, would most weaken the claim that thicker bark caused the trees to keep growing through the drought?