📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 11)

Drill 11 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 10
Next drill
Drill 12
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions →
Drill 11 — current you are here
Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 11) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Five hard Command of Evidence questions on fresh topics, built around new findings and two data displays. Most wrong choices are accurate in themselves but answer a slightly different question than the argument poses. For the graphs, check which contrast the claim actually rests on before choosing.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which finding, if true, would most help distinguish between the two researchers' explanations?
  2. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the maker's conclusion?
  3. Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the analysts' proposal?
  4. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to identify the vent the geologists should flag?
  5. Which finding, if true, would most support the interpretation that the jays anticipate a future need?