📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 17)

Drill 17 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 16
Next drill
Drill 18
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions →
Drill 17 — current you are here
Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 17) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

A set of five hard Command of Evidence items spanning new findings, two data displays, and a passage from a classic novel. The traps here mostly tell the truth, but only part of it, or they match the topic while missing the relationship the claim turns on. Pin down what the evidence has to establish, then pick the option that establishes the whole of it.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the scientist's conclusion?
  2. Which finding, if true, would most support the conservator's proposal?
  3. Which quotation from "The House of Mirth" most effectively illustrates the student's claim?
  4. Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the agronomist's proposal?
  5. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to identify the script the scholar should flag?