📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 4)

Drill 4 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 3
Next drill
Drill 5
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions →
Drill 4 — current you are here
Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 4) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Five hard Command of Evidence questions: new findings, a table, a graph, and a passage from a classic novel. In each, three choices are true or on point yet miss part of what the claim asserts. Match the evidence to the whole claim, including any second condition it sets.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which finding, if true, would most directly support the astronomers' proposal?
  2. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table that support the researchers' conclusion?
  3. Which finding, if true, would most directly support the historian's proposal?
  4. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the workers' conclusion?
  5. Which quotation from "Pride and Prejudice" most effectively illustrates the student's claim?