📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 15)

Drill 15 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 14
Next drill
Drill 16
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions →
Drill 15 — current you are here
Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 15) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Five hard Command of Evidence questions spanning new findings, two data displays, and a scholarly quotation. Throughout, the wrong choices tend to be true on their own while answering a slightly different question than the argument asks. Read each display and each quotation for the exact link the claim depends on.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the statement?
  2. Which finding, if true, would most support the firsthand-survey explanation over the copying one?
  3. Which quotation from a scholarly article best supports the student's argument?
  4. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the officials' conclusion?
  5. Which finding, if true, would most help distinguish between the two explanations?