📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 13)

Drill 13 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 12
Next drill
Drill 14
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions → Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions →
Drill 13 — current you are here
Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 13) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Five hard Command of Evidence questions on fresh subjects, anchored by new findings and two data displays. In each, three choices are true or nearly true yet miss the exact relationship the argument needs. The graph and table items reward checking which slope, gap, or cell the claim truly depends on.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the hydrologists' conclusion?
  2. Which finding, if true, would most support the recruitment explanation over the chance one?
  3. If the researchers' proposal is correct, which result would they most expect to see?
  4. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to support the scientists' conclusion?
  5. Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the company's proposal?