📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 3)

Drill 3 · Reading & Writing · Hard Command of Evidence

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 2
Next drill
Drill 4
More Sat Reading Writing Command Of Evidence Hard drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions →
Drill 3 — current you are here
Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions → Drill 7 5 questions → Drill 8 5 questions → Drill 9 5 questions → Drill 10 5 questions → Drill 11 5 questions → Drill 12 5 questions → Drill 13 5 questions → Drill 14 5 questions → Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions → Drill 18 5 questions → Drill 19 5 questions → Drill 20 5 questions → Drill 21 5 questions → Drill 22 5 questions → Drill 23 5 questions → Drill 24 5 questions → Drill 25 5 questions → Drill 26 5 questions → Drill 27 5 questions → Drill 28 5 questions → Drill 29 5 questions → Drill 30 5 questions →

About This Drill

SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Command of Evidence (Drill 3) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Five hard Command of Evidence questions covering new findings, a graph, a table, and a scholarly quotation. The tempting wrong answers are true or close, but only one does the exact job the claim requires. Read the data items carefully and check each quotation against the precise assertion it is meant to back.

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken the researchers' conclusion?
  2. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the statement?
  3. Which finding, if true, would most directly support the biologists' proposal?
  4. Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the clinic's conclusion?
  5. Which quotation from a scholarly article best supports the student's assertion?