Drill 29 ·
AP Biology: Unit 7, Natural Selection: Evolutionary Mechanisms (Drill 29) is a practice drill. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
Test your understanding of natural selection evidence using a real-world rock pocket mouse case study. Analyze genotype frequency data and owl predation to evaluate claims about directional selection operating in different microhabitats.
| Zone | MM | Mm | mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lava Flow | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.12 |
| Sandy Wash | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.72 |
Question 1. Based on the data in Table 1, what does the allele frequency shift between Year 1 and Year 3 in the lava flow zone most directly indicate?
Explanation: Correct answer: C. The M allele frequency in the lava flow zone rose from ~0.48 to 0.675, calculated as freq(MM) + 0.5·freq(Mm) = 0.47 + 0.5(0.41) = 0.47 + 0.205 = 0.675. Since predation by visually hunting owls is the primary selective agent, dark-coated mice (M_) survive to reproductive maturity at higher rates on dark lava substrate, directly increasing M allele frequency. (A) is incorrect because random drift would produce unpredictable changes in both zones and cannot explain the consistent directional shift toward M in lava and m in sandy wash. (B) is incorrect because gene flow between zones would tend to homogenize allele frequencies, not drive them in opposite directions. (D) is incorrect because the passage attributes the selective agent to owl predation based on visual contrast, not to a reproductive mechanism independent of coat color.
Question 2. In the sandy wash zone, which mice are most likely to survive to reproductive maturity, and why?
Explanation: Correct answer: A. In the sandy wash zone, the substrate is pale tan. Owls hunting by visual contrast will detect dark-coated mice more easily against this pale background. Pale-coated (mm) mice are cryptic, reducing detection and predation risk, allowing them to survive to reproductive maturity at higher rates. The data support this: mm frequency reaches 0.72 in the sandy wash by Year 3. (B) is incorrect because dominance describes inheritance pattern, not inherent fitness; fitness is always environment-dependent. (C) is incorrect because heterozygote advantage is a specific mechanism that must be demonstrated; the passage provides no evidence for it here. (D) is incorrect because natural selection operates whenever heritable traits are associated with differential survival or reproduction, regardless of resource limitation.
Question 3. A researcher claims: "The divergence in coat color frequencies between the two zones after three years is more consistent with natural selection than genetic drift." Which of the following best evaluates this claim?
Explanation: Correct answer: D. The key signature distinguishing natural selection from genetic drift is directionality and predictability. In the lava flow zone, M allele frequency increased (favoring dark coats on dark substrate); in the sandy wash, m allele frequency increased (favoring pale coats on pale substrate). These opposite, environment-matched shifts are consistent with directional selection driven by the identified selective agent. Genetic drift produces random, unpredictable changes that would not reliably match substrate in both zones simultaneously. (A) is incorrect because n = 120 is a reasonable sample size and both zones show consistent directional trends, making drift less likely as the sole explanation. (B) is incorrect because differential genotype frequencies over time in habitat-appropriate directions are valid indirect evidence for differential survival. (C) is incorrect because differing mutation rates would introduce variation randomly, not produce the directional, substrate-matched divergence observed.
Question 4. If a wall were built between the lava flow and sandy wash zones, completely preventing migration between them, what would be the most likely long-term outcome?
Explanation: Correct answer: B. Preventing gene flow means the two populations evolve independently. Each continues to experience directional selection from owl predation, and mutations, genetic drift, and other selection pressures will accumulate separately. Over many generations the populations may diverge increasingly in genotype and potentially in additional traits. Increased divergence is the most certain near-term outcome; whether this divergence eventually reaches reproductive isolation depends on the degree and duration of isolation and the pace of other evolutionary changes; it is a possible longer-term consequence, not a guaranteed one. (A) is incorrect because mutation alone would not reverse strong directional selection or cause convergence between populations under different selective regimes. (C) is incorrect because balancing selection maintains variation within a population; these zones are under different directional pressures. (D) is incorrect because genetic drift eliminates alleles gradually, not immediately.
Question 5. The rock pocket mouse study is often cited as evidence for natural selection acting in observable time. Which feature of the study design most strengthens this interpretation?
Explanation: Correct answer: B. The strength of this study comes from combining several elements: measurable heritable variation (MC1R genotypes), documented allele frequency change across years, a defined time period, and an identified ecologically plausible selective agent (owl predation by visual contrast). Together these make the data consistent with directional selection operating in each habitat. Compared to fossil evidence, which shows change over time but cannot directly measure allele frequencies or identify selective agents in real time, this study provides a more complete mechanistic picture. (A) is incorrect because precision of measurement, while valuable, is not the key distinguishing feature. (C) is incorrect because the study is in the Sonoran Desert, not on an island, and population size affects drift, not the quality of the selection evidence. (D) is incorrect because the study does not claim coat color is the only selected trait, and overclaiming would weaken rather than strengthen the conclusions.