Drill 7 ยท Reading & Writing ยท Standard English Conventions
SAT Reading & Writing: Standard English Conventions (Drill 7) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Standard English Conventions. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
Five hard questions on using a colon after a complete clause, placing a conjunctive adverb, subject-verb agreement with a long subject, the past perfect for sequencing two past events, and separate possessive apostrophes.
Question 1. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: (A) is right because the words before the blank form a complete clause, and a colon is the mark that introduces the explanation of what the gears were built to do. (B) drops in a comma, which cannot set up an explanation this way. (C) uses a semicolon, but a semicolon joins two complete clauses, and "track the positions of the sun and the moon and the timing of eclipses" cannot stand on its own. (D) runs the two parts together, so the reader loses the signal that an explanation is coming.
Question 2. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: "However" belongs with the second statement, and when it opens a complete clause that follows another complete clause, it takes a semicolon before it and a comma after it, so (B) is correct. (A) puts a comma on both sides, which leaves two complete clauses spliced together. (C) keeps the semicolon but slides the comma to the wrong spot, cutting "however" off from the clause it introduces. (D) gives "however" no punctuation at all, fusing the two clauses.
Question 3. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The subject is "hoard," which is singular, so the verb is "is," making (A) correct. (B) "are" and (C) "remain" both match the nearer plural "coins," but that noun is not the subject. (D) "were" is plural too, and it shifts the sentence into the past for no reason. Strip out the describing phrases and you are left with "A hoard is," which confirms it.
Question 4. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: Two past actions are in play. Jenner published in 1798, and he had treated the boy two years before that, so the earlier action takes the past perfect and (C) "had inoculated" is correct. (B) "inoculated" is simple past, which flattens the order and makes both events sound simultaneous. (A) "inoculates" is present tense and clashes with the 1798 setting. (D) "has inoculated" is present perfect, which cannot pin down a finished moment like "two years earlier."
Question 5. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The sentence says the journals were kept separately, so each man owned his own, and both names take an apostrophe and "s," which makes (D) correct. (A) "Lewis and Clark's" marks only the second name, pointing to joint possession rather than the separate journals the sentence describes. (B) leaves "Clark" with no apostrophe at all. (C) writes "Lewises'" as though pluralizing the surname, which is not what the sentence means.