Drill 10 ยท Reading & Writing ยท Standard English Conventions
SAT Reading & Writing: Standard English Conventions (Drill 10) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Standard English Conventions. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
These five questions cover joining two complete sentences, a colon before a list, the comma after an opening clause, a dangling modifier, and choosing a main verb over a participle.
Question 1. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: Two complete sentences meet at the blank: "expeditions sailed... to time the transit of Venus" and "the measurements promised a more accurate estimate of the distance." Only a semicolon can join two independent clauses like these, which is what (B) does. (A) puts a comma between two full sentences, which is a comma splice. (C) reads as if Venus and the measurements together are the subject of "promised," which scrambles the meaning. (D) runs the two sentences together with no punctuation at all.
Question 2. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: A colon sets up the list that follows, and the words in front of it, "sets fixed penalties for a range of everyday matters," form a complete sentence, so (A) works. (B) turns "matters" into the first item of the list, which is not what the sentence says. (C) uses a semicolon, but a semicolon cannot introduce a list. (D) leaves no break at all, so "matters" collides with "unpaid debts."
Question 3. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The sentence opens with a dependent clause, "Because a sourdough starter is... kept alive by regular feeding," which attaches to the main clause with a comma, so (D) is right. (A) uses a semicolon, but a semicolon cannot follow a dependent clause. (B) puts a period after "feeding," leaving the "Because" clause as a fragment. (C) drops the punctuation, so "feeding" runs straight into "a baker."
Question 4. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The opening phrase has to describe whoever did the translating, and that person is Ada Lovelace, so the main clause should start with her name, as in (C). (A) makes "the appended notes" the translator. (B) puts Lovelace inside an "it was" construction, so the noun right after the modifier is still "it," not a person who could translate. (D) puts "Lovelace's notes" in the subject spot, but the notes did not do the translating either.
Question 5. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The subject "Mangrove forests" needs a main verb, and the plural finite form "shield" supplies it, so (B) is correct. (A) "shielding" is a participle, which leaves the sentence with no main verb and turns it into a fragment. (C) "to shield" does the same thing. (D) "shields" is finite but singular, so it does not agree with the plural "forests."