Drill 2 · Reading & Writing · Standard English Conventions
SAT Reading & Writing: Standard English Conventions (Drill 2) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Standard English Conventions. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
These five hard questions cover punctuation, verb forms, and modifier placement, with a full explanation for every answer.
Question 1. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The phrase "a keyboard instrument whose strings are plucked rather than struck" interrupts the main clause "The harpsichord ... produces a bright tone." Because the interruption is opened with a dash, it has to be closed with a matching dash, so (B) is correct. (A) closes with a comma, which does not match the dash already used to open the interruption. (C) gives no closing mark, so the aside runs straight into the main verb "produces." (D) uses a semicolon, but a semicolon joins two independent clauses, and "produces a bright tone..." has no subject of its own.
Question 2. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The main clause is already complete: "maps... remained." The phrase set off by commas, "their topographic detail ______ that of many contemporary European maps," is a supplementary element, so it needs a nonfinite participle, which makes "surpassing" in (A) correct. The finite verbs in (B), (C), and (D) each create a second main clause wedged between commas, a comma splice; even (D) "was surpassing," which matches the singular "detail" in number, still splices.
Question 3. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The clause "He was not the first to recognize the pattern" is the turn against the previous sentence, which credits Fibonacci with bringing the sequence to Europe, so "however" belongs with that clause: the comma before it sets it off, and the semicolon after it joins the clause to the one that follows. That is what (C) does, so it is correct. (A) sets off "however" but leaves no mark to join the two main clauses, so the sentence runs on. (B) is punctuated in a way that looks right, but it moves "however" onto the second clause, marking that clause as the contrast; the point about earlier Indian scholars is not a contrast to "He was not the first," it is the evidence for it, so "however" does not belong there. (D) joins the two main clauses with a comma after "however," a comma splice.
Question 4. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The opening phrase, "Trained as a musician and working for years as a church organist before he turned to the night sky," can describe only a person, so the clause after it has to begin with the person it describes, William Herschel. (D) puts "William Herschel" right after the modifier, so it is correct. (A) places "the discovery of Uranus" next to the modifier, which says the discovery trained as a musician. (B) opens with the "it was... who" construction, so the grammatical subject is "it," which the modifier cannot describe. (C) begins with "William Herschel's discovery," so the noun next to the modifier is the discovery, not Herschel; the right person is present, but only as a possessive. Each of those three is a dangling modifier.
Question 5. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The complete subject is long: "the photographs produced during the Great Depression by documentary photographer Dorothea Lange." Its verb is "remain." No matter how long a subject runs, you never separate it from its verb with punctuation, so (B), with nothing added, is correct. The name "Dorothea Lange" is essential because it identifies whose photographs these are, so it cannot be set off either. (A) drops a comma between the subject and "remain," which both cuts the subject off from its verb and suggests, wrongly, that the name could be removed. (C) and (D) make the same mistake with a semicolon and a colon, and both of those marks expect a complete clause on at least one side, which is not the case here.