Drill 25 · Reading & Writing · Standard English Conventions
SAT Reading & Writing: Standard English Conventions (Drill 25) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Standard English Conventions. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
Five hard SAT Standard English Conventions items covering single dash with a summarizing clause, comma plus coordinating conjunction joining two independent clauses, parallel structure in a verb series, misplaced "only," and past perfect for the earlier of two past events.
Question 1. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The dash in (B) correctly links a fronted list (Beak shape, body size, and feeding habits) to the summarizing clause that follows (these three traits later helped biologists explain...). (A) sets a comma between a noun phrase and a full clause, which a comma alone cannot do. (C) puts a semicolon in the same spot, but a semicolon needs a complete clause on both sides, and what comes before is only a list of nouns. (D) tries a colon, which also requires a complete clause on its left side.
Question 2. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: Two complete sentences sit on either side of the join (one about the 1811 ichthyosaur, one about the plesiosaur more than a decade later), and the standard way to fuse two clauses of this length is comma plus a coordinating conjunction. (D) supplies both. (A) drops the comma, leaving a bare "and" between two long independent clauses. (B) keeps "and" but adds a semicolon, an over-punctuation since the semicolon already does the joining work of comma plus and. (C) leaves the comma without the conjunction, which creates a comma splice.
Question 3. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The series here strings three actions on the same subject "it": "linked," "kept," and the blank. To keep parallel form, the third item has to match the others: a past-tense verb without a repeated subject. (C) "ran" does that. (A) shifts to the -ing form, marking "running" as a participle rather than a verb in the series. (B) reintroduces "it," breaking the pattern of three verbs sharing a single subject. (D) shifts to an infinitive, which can't sit alongside "linked" and "kept."
Question 4. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The sentence contrasts one zeppelin's fate with the other, so the limiter "only" needs to sit immediately before the noun it picks out. (A) places it there: "only the Hindenburg" means that ship and no other. (B) shifts "only" between subject and verb, where it now modifies "was destroyed," reading as "the only thing that happened to the Hindenburg was being destroyed" and so losing the contrast. (C) makes "only" an adjective on "Hindenburg," tagging the ship as unique in the world rather than singling it out from the pair. (D) puts commas on both sides of "only," treating it as a parenthetical aside, an awkward substitute for placing the limiter directly in front of what it limits.
Question 5. Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Explanation: The sentence names two past events with a clear sequence: Tubman's own escape in 1849, then her rescue missions starting in the early 1850s. The earlier of two past events takes the past perfect, so (B) "had escaped" is the right form. (A) flattens both events into the simple past, so the reader can't tell which one came first. (C) puts the escape into the past progressive, as if it were in progress at a single past moment, but the escape was a completed action years before. (D) uses the present perfect "has escaped," which doesn't pair with a specific past time marker like "just a year earlier."