Drill 29 ยท Reading & Writing ยท Hard Rhetorical Synthesis
SAT Reading & Writing: Hard Rhetorical Synthesis (Drill 29) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Hard Rhetorical Synthesis. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
Hard Rhetorical Synthesis questions present a set of research notes and a specific writing goal, then ask you to choose the sentence that best accomplishes that goal using only the notes. The wrong answers are usually accurate statements that serve a different purpose than the one asked for, or that subtly misstate the notes. Match the rhetorical task exactly.
Question 1. The student wants to introduce the semaphore telegraph to readers who have never heard of it. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation: Choice A is the best answer. The sentence introduces the system as a whole, relay towers passing arm signals onward faster than a rider, which is what the goal asks for. Choice B gives a single operating step, a detail rather than an overview. Choice C dwells on a limitation of the lines, a drawback rather than an introduction. Choice D states one advantage, a narrow point rather than a full introduction.
Question 2. The student wants to convey the difference between the two wheels in both where the water meets the wheel and which property of the water drives it. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation: Choice B is the best answer. The sentence gives both bases the goal names, water at the top driving by weight versus water at the bottom driving by motion, for each wheel. Choice A reports the efficiency outcome, a consequence rather than the two-part difference. Choice C describes only the undershot wheel on only the placement base, not the paired contrast. Choice D contrasts where the water meets each wheel but omits which property of the water drives it.
Question 3. The student wants to quote the manual to capture how the two methods place ink on opposite parts of the surface. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation: Choice D is the best answer. The sentence quotes the line that captures the opposed placement, raised lines on the block against incised lines on the plate, which is the contrast the goal asks for. Choice A quotes a line about the woodblock alone, emphasizing one method rather than the contrast. Choice B quotes a remark on the skill copperplate demands, not where the ink sits. Choice C quotes a shared requirement of both methods rather than the difference between them.
Question 4. The student wants to summarize how a dressed millstone grinds grain into flour. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation: Choice C is the best answer. The sentence condenses the whole process, grain entering at the eye, sheared by the furrows, and swept out to be ground at the rim, which is the summary the goal asks for. Choice A covers only the dressing of the stones, one part rather than the process. Choice B dwells on the scissor-like shearing as though it were the entire account rather than one stage of it. Choice D names the two stones, the parts rather than how they grind.
Question 5. The student wants to convey why pemmican mattered as a way to preserve food for travel. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explanation: Choice A is the best answer. The sentence states why pemmican mattered, that its years-long keeping without refrigeration made long travel and winter survival possible, which is the significance the goal asks for. Choice B describes how pemmican is made, a method rather than its importance. Choice C explains the preserving mechanism, how it works rather than why it mattered. Choice D notes one later group of users, a single instance rather than the broad significance.