Drill 4 ยท
Idea Origination and Vision and Mission is a practice drill. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
A founder identifies an unmet need in a local market and checks a proposed product against the venture's vision and mission statements; uses an invented venture and original details.
Dana is starting a venture called Pellmont, a phone app that instantly connects homeowners with nearby vetted repair workers for small repair jobs. Before building it, Dana writes down what she has learned about the local market and drafts statements to guide the company.
What Dana found, and what she wrote
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Observed problem | Homeowners wait days for a repair worker and cannot easily tell who is reliable |
| Current options | Phone directories and word of mouth; no fast way to compare vetted workers |
| Pellmont vision statement | A neighborhood where every small home repair is solved within a day |
| Pellmont mission statement | We connect homeowners with vetted local repair workers through a simple app |
| Proposed first feature | Same-day matching with background-checked workers and visible ratings |
Question 1. According to Dana's notes, what problem are local homeowners currently facing?
Explanation: The correct choice is that they wait days and cannot easily tell who is reliable (B). The 'Observed problem' row states exactly this. Taxes (A) are not mentioned. Having too many fast vetted options (C) is the opposite of what Dana found; the notes say there is no fast way to compare vetted workers. Nothing says hiring is banned (D).
Question 2. Which statement best describes the market opportunity Dana has identified?
Explanation: The correct choice is an unmet need for fast, trustworthy matching between homeowners and vetted local workers (C). A market opportunity is an unmet customer need a venture can serve; here the gap is speed plus trust, which current options (directories, word of mouth) do not fill. Selling directory ads (A) targets the old option Dana is replacing, not the unmet need. Lowering workers' wages (B) is not the need described. Teaching homeowners to do every repair themselves (D) contradicts the demand for hiring help.
Question 3. Dana wrote both a vision statement and a mission statement. Which choice correctly explains the difference between the two?
Explanation: The correct distinction is in A: the vision is the future aspiration, and the mission is what the venture does now and for whom. Pellmont's vision ('a neighborhood where every small home repair is solved within a day') is the aspirational future, and its mission ('we connect homeowners with vetted local repair workers through a simple app') describes its present purpose and customers. Choice B reverses the two. They are not identical (C); they play different roles. Neither statement is about prices or costs (D).
Question 4. Why does the proposed first feature (same-day matching with background-checked, rated workers) fit Pellmont's stated mission?
Explanation: The correct choice is that it directly delivers the fast, vetted connection the mission promises (B). The mission is to connect homeowners with vetted local repair workers through a simple app, and same-day matching with background-checked, rated workers is exactly that connection. It has nothing to do with the company's tax rate (A). It carries out the existing mission rather than changing it (C). It still relies on repair workers rather than removing them (D).
Question 5. Before building the full app, which step would best test whether Dana's market opportunity is real?
Explanation: The correct choice is to run a small low-cost pilot in one neighborhood (D). Testing an opportunity means gathering real evidence of demand at low cost, and a small neighborhood pilot shows whether homeowners actually book and return. Spending the whole budget on national advertising (A) is a large bet before any evidence exists. Rewriting the vision again (B) does not test demand. Assuming it works because the founder likes it (C) is not a test at all.