Drill 23 ยท
Business Expenses and Financial Capital Drill 23 is a practice drill. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
A tool manufacturer classifies its costs and weighs a debt-versus-equity funding choice; uses an invented company and original figures.
Calderwright Tools manufactures hand tools. The monthly costs below are each labeled two ways: fixed or variable (does the total change as output changes?) and direct or indirect (can it be traced to a specific product?). All figures are in dollars per month.
Calderwright Tools: Monthly Cost Schedule
| Cost | Amount | Fixed/Variable | Direct/Indirect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory rent | 8,000 | Fixed | Indirect |
| Steel and raw materials | 22,000 | Variable | Direct |
| Assembly-line wages | 15,000 | Variable | Direct |
| Factory supervisor salary | 6,000 | Fixed | Indirect |
| Equipment depreciation | 4,000 | Fixed | Indirect |
| Packaging materials | 5,000 | Variable | Direct |
| Total | 60,000 |
Separately, Calderwright needs 100,000 dollars to buy a new cutting machine and is weighing two ways to raise it. Option A (debt): a loan charging 8 percent simple annual interest; the owner keeps 100 percent ownership. Option B (equity): sell a 20 percent ownership stake to an investor for 100,000 dollars; no interest is owed, but the investor then receives 20 percent of annual profit.
Question 1. What are Calderwright's total monthly fixed costs?
Explanation: Q1: Data interpretation. The answer is 18,000. The fixed costs are factory rent (8,000), supervisor salary (6,000), and equipment depreciation (4,000): 8,000 + 6,000 + 4,000 = 18,000. 12,000 omits one fixed line. 42,000 is the total of the variable costs, not the fixed ones. 60,000 is total cost across both categories.
Question 2. Steel and raw materials are labeled a direct cost. What makes a cost direct rather than indirect?
Explanation: Q2: Concept. The answer is that it can be traced to a specific product the firm makes. Steel goes directly into the tools, so it is a direct cost; the direct/indirect split is about traceability to a product. The first choice describes a fixed cost (the fixed/variable axis), not a direct cost. The second describes a sunk cost. The third is irrelevant to whether a cost is direct, since supplier-set prices can be either direct or indirect.
Question 3. Under Option A, how much simple annual interest would Calderwright owe on the 100,000 dollar loan in one year?
Explanation: Q3: Calculation. The answer is 8,000. Simple annual interest is 100,000 x 8 percent = 8,000. 10,000 uses 10 percent. 16,000 doubles the one-year figure as if for two years. 20,000 confuses the interest with the investor's 20 percent profit share under the other option.
Question 4. Suppose Calderwright expects 90,000 dollars of annual profit before financing costs or investor distributions. Comparing the two options in that year, which statement is correct?
Explanation: Q4: Decision (apply criteria). The answer is that Option A costs 8,000 while Option B costs the owner 18,000 of profit, so Option A is cheaper that year. Debt interest is 100,000 x 8 percent = 8,000; the equity investor's 20 percent share of 90,000 profit is 18,000, so debt is the cheaper financing in a year with that profit. The first choice is wrong because Option B still has a real cost, the 18,000 profit share, even with no interest. The second is wrong because 8,000 does not equal 18,000. The fourth reverses the ownership effect, since it is Option B (equity), not Option A, that gives up ownership.
Question 5. Late in the year the supervisor suggests recording some of the steel purchases as factory rent so the variable-cost line looks lower to a lender. For deciding how this pressure could affect the business, this is best treated as:
Explanation: Q5: Decision (internal factor). The answer is that it is an internal ethics-and-control issue involving misclassified costs. Deliberately moving steel (a variable, direct cost) into rent (a fixed, indirect line) would distort the statements a lender relies on, an internal factor that can mislead lenders and harm the firm's credibility and access to credit. It is not an opportunity cost, which is the value of a forgone alternative. It is not a fixed cost; the misclassification is the issue, not a cost category. It is not a marketing decision, since it concerns financial reporting, not promotion.