Drill 1 ยท Multiple Choice ยท Unit 1: The Global Tapestry
AP World History Unit 1 Drill 1 is a Multiple Choice practice drill covering Unit 1: The Global Tapestry. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
This drill focuses on developments in East Asia from c. 1200 to c. 1450, with emphasis on Song Dynasty governance, economic innovation, and the tension between merchant wealth and Confucian social hierarchy. Read the passage carefully, then answer all five questions.
Adapted from a memorial submitted to the Song Dynasty imperial court by a regional administrator, c. 1150 CE.
"Our dynasty has long governed through the examination system, by which men of talent, regardless of birth, may rise to serve the Son of Heaven. The candidates study the classical texts of Confucius and demonstrate mastery of ritual, history, and governance before they are entrusted with office. In recent years, revenues have grown considerably through commerce along our canals and market towns. The paper certificates issued by merchants have proved so useful that the court itself has authorized their use as a medium of exchange. Yet the growth of merchant wealth, while beneficial to imperial revenues, must not be permitted to displace the scholar-official class in prestige or authority. Such prosperity has brought many merchants into positions of wealth previously reserved for families of learning and office. The proper order of society demands that those who govern do so by virtue of learning, not by the accumulation of coin."
Question 1. Which of the following best describes the main argument of this memorial?
Explanation: B is correct. The administrator acknowledges that commercial expansion benefits imperial revenues, but his central concern is that merchant wealth must not displace the scholar-official class. The closing sentence makes this explicit: governance must rest on learning, not wealth. A is wrong, the author strongly defends the examination system; he argues for preserving it, not abolishing it. C is wrong, the author does not oppose paper currency; he notes the court authorized it and frames it as useful. D is wrong, this inverts the author's position. He warns against merchants gaining political influence; the passage's tone is cautionary, not reformist. A student tempted by D should note the word "should be granted", the author argues the exact opposite.
Question 2. The author's point of view in this memorial is most likely shaped by his position as
Explanation: C is correct. The author invokes Confucian learning and the examination system as the proper basis of governance, and his alarm at merchant wealth reflects a scholar-official's direct self-interest; his own prestige and authority rest on the system he is defending. A is wrong, a merchant would argue for commerce, not against its social consequences. B is wrong, while the author uses moral language, his framework is Confucian social hierarchy, not Buddhist ethics; no Buddhist concern appears in the passage. D is wrong, the author mentions revenues but only to note that commerce helps the state; military funding is entirely absent from the memorial's argument.
Question 3. The economic developments described in this passage are best understood in the context of which broader historical development?
Explanation: B is correct. The Song Dynasty experienced one of the most significant commercial revolutions in premodern world history. Innovations in agriculture (Champa rice), expansion of the Grand Canal, urban growth, and paper money all drove unprecedented economic commercialization, exactly what the passage describes. A is wrong, the Mongol conquest came after this document and disrupted rather than enabled these commercial trends; this is a chronology trap. C is wrong, while Muslim merchants were active in Song trade networks, the commercial developments described are internal Chinese developments. D is wrong, the Silk Roads were not in decline during the Song period; Song China was in fact a major exporter along them.
Question 4. The tension described in this passage between merchants and scholar-officials most closely resembles which of the following?
Explanation: B is correct. In medieval Europe, the rise of a merchant class in growing towns created direct tension with the established landed nobility, whose status derived from hereditary landholding and military service rather than commerce, a structural parallel to the Song scholar-official's concern that merchants might displace those whose authority rests on learning. Both cases involve an established governing elite threatened by the rising wealth and social prestige of merchants. A is wrong, while the ulama did engage merchants on questions of interest (riba), this was primarily a legal and religious debate, not a contest over who governed; the ulama were not a civil service threatened with displacement. C is wrong, this describes an administrative conflict within the Mongol state apparatus, not a tension between a merit-based governing class and a commercial class. D is wrong, the Mali mansas actually depended on and cooperated with trans-Saharan merchants; the relationship was symbiotic rather than rivalrous over status.
Question 5. Which development after 1450 most directly continued the pattern described in this passage?
Explanation: A is correct. The Ming Dynasty represents a direct continuation of what the Song administrator advocated: reassertion of Confucian scholarly governance over commercial interests. The Ming curtailed Zheng He's voyages after 1433, restricted maritime trade, and reinforced the examination system, precisely the pattern the author urged. B is wrong, the Yuan Dynasty inverted the Song hierarchy, placing merchants and Mongols above Han scholar-officials; this is the outcome the author feared, not a continuation of his preferred order. C is wrong, the Protestant Reformation concerns European religious authority and has no connection to East Asian social hierarchies. D is wrong, the devshirme recruited administrators from non-elite backgrounds, which superficially resembles the examination system, but it served Ottoman military-administrative needs and did not address the merchant-versus-scholar tension at all.