📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams
About Contact Blog Privacy Policy

AP English Language: Rhetorical Situation (Writing Drill 3)

Drill 3 · Writing · Rhetorical Situation — Writing

0 / 5
←
Previous drill
Drill 2
More Ap English Language Rhetorical Situation Writing drills
Drill 1 5 questions → Drill 2 5 questions →
Drill 3 — current you are here

About This Drill

AP English Language: Rhetorical Situation (Writing Drill 3) is a Writing practice drill covering Rhetorical Situation — Writing. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Writing drills ask you to read like a writer, analyzing a student draft and choosing revisions that improve its rhetorical effectiveness. This drill emphasizes purpose-driven revision, choosing the sentence that most precisely expresses the writer's stated goal rather than a near-miss that is generally relevant.

Passage

The following is a draft of a student personal essay written for a college application. The student is reflecting on what she learned from two years of volunteering at a food bank. [1] I have volunteered at the Riverside Food Bank for two years. [2] During that time, I have learned a lot about myself and about my community. [3] The experience has changed the way I think about food, poverty, and what it means to help someone. [4] When I first started, I thought volunteering would feel good. [5] I imagined I would arrive, hand out food, and leave feeling proud of myself. [6] What actually happened was more complicated. [7] On my second shift, a man named Mr. Torres asked me what I was doing there. [8] I said I was volunteering to help people. [9] He looked at me for a moment and then said, "That's a funny way to put it." [10] I did not understand what he meant until much later. [11] Over the following months, I came to understand that the food bank was not a place where people with resources helped people without them. [12] It was a place where people worked together, clients, volunteers, staff, to solve a problem that none of them had caused and that none of them could solve alone. [13] Mr. Torres was a regular client who also sorted donations every Tuesday. [14] The woman who trained me on the register was a former client who had found stable housing and wanted to give back. [15] The lines between helper and helped were not lines at all. [16] I used to think that service meant doing something for someone. [17] I now think it means doing something with someone. [18] The difference is small in words and large in practice. [19] What I bring to college is not two years of community service. [20] It is two years of learning that the most important problems do not yield to charity. [21] They yield to solidarity.

Questions & Explanations

Question 1. The writer wants to revise sentences 1–3 to create an opening that more effectively draws in a college admissions reader. Which revision best accomplishes this goal?

  • A) Volunteering at a food bank is one of the most rewarding experiences a high school student can have, and I am grateful for the opportunity to have done it.
  • B) Community service is an important part of a well-rounded education, and my two years at the Riverside Food Bank have taught me many valuable lessons.
  • C) On my second shift at the Riverside Food Bank, a man named Mr. Torres asked me what I was doing there. I gave what I thought was an obvious answer. He told me it was a funny way to put it. It took me two years to understand why he was right. ✓
  • D) I have spent two years volunteering at a food bank, and during that time I have come to understand the true meaning of community and service in ways I never expected.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. College admissions readers read thousands of essays about volunteering. The original opening is generic. Choice C opens in the middle of a specific, intriguing scene; Mr. Torres's cryptic response, and creates immediate narrative tension that makes the reader want to continue. Choices A and B are generic statements about service that do not distinguish the essay. Choice D improves slightly on the original but is still abstract and predictable.

Question 2. The writer wants to revise sentence 6; 'What actually happened was more complicated', to create a more vivid and specific transition into the Mr. Torres anecdote. Which revision best accomplishes this?

  • A) Instead, I found myself unsettled in ways I had not anticipated, starting with a question I could not answer. ✓
  • B) However, the reality of volunteering turned out to be very different from what I had imagined it would be in the context described.
  • C) But volunteering is always more complicated than people expect it to be.
  • D) The experience was surprising in many ways that I will describe in the following paragraphs.

Explanation: Choice A is correct. The original is vague. Choice A replaces it with specific emotional language ('unsettled') and forward momentum ('starting with a question I could not answer'), which creates a tighter bridge to the Mr. Torres encounter. Choice B is a slight improvement but still generic. Choice C shifts to a universal claim about volunteering that flattens the personal voice. Choice D is mechanical and breaks the essay's intimate tone.

Question 3. The writer wants to add a sentence after sentence 15 to deepen the insight about the blurred line between helper and helped. Which addition best serves this purpose?

  • A) The food bank served over five hundred families each week, and it could not have operated without the contributions of both volunteers and clients.
  • B) Many nonprofits have begun to recognize the value of involving community members in program design and service delivery.
  • C) I realized that my original motivation for volunteering, to help others, had been based on a false assumption about who had what to offer.
  • D) I had arrived thinking I knew which side of the counter I belonged on. The food bank disagreed. ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct. The essay has just described how the lines between helper and helped dissolved. Choice D captures that realization in a concrete, wry image, the counter as a boundary the institution refused to enforce, that is stylistically consistent with the essay's voice and deepens the paragraph's insight with compression and wit. Choice A adds statistical context that interrupts the reflective tone. Choice B introduces a general claim about nonprofits that is too abstract and distancing. Choice C states the insight explicitly but less vividly than Choice D.

Question 4. The writer wants to revise sentence 18; 'The difference is small in words and large in practice', to make the distinction between 'for' and 'with' more concrete and persuasive. Which revision best accomplishes this?

  • A) This distinction between 'for' and 'with' is philosophically significant and has been recognized by scholars of community engagement.
  • B) Doing something for someone assumes you know what they need. Doing something with someone begins by asking. ✓
  • C) Service that is done for people can feel patronizing, whereas service done with people is more likely to be effective and sustainable.
  • D) The preposition matters more than people realize, because it determines the entire relationship between the server and the served.

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The original sentence acknowledges the distinction without illustrating it. Choice B makes it concrete: 'for' encodes an assumption of knowledge; 'with' begins with a question. This is specific, memorable, and consistent with the essay's reflective voice. Choice A cites scholarly recognition, which is out of register for a personal essay. Choice C makes the point in abstract sociological terms that are less personal. Choice D restates the importance of the distinction without actually showing what it means.

Question 5. A college counselor suggests that the essay's conclusion would be stronger if it more explicitly connected the food bank experience to what the student will bring to college. Which revision of sentences 19–21 best accomplishes this?

  • A) My two years at the food bank have taught me skills in organization, communication, and teamwork that I look forward to applying in a college setting.
  • B) I am excited to bring my passion for community service to college, where I hope to continue volunteering and encouraging others to do the same.
  • C) What I bring to college is not two years of community service hours. It is a different question: not what can I do for the people around me, but what can we build together? The food bank taught me to ask that question. I intend to keep asking it. ✓
  • D) Ultimately, the food bank experience has shaped my values and given me a new perspective on service, community, and what it means to be part of something larger than myself.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. It preserves the essay's voice and the 'for vs. with' distinction developed in the preceding paragraphs, then explicitly projects the question into the college context. The final two sentences connect the food bank learning directly to the student's future orientation, which is what a college application essay conclusion should do. Choice A lists generic skills and lacks the personal voice of the essay. Choice B is enthusiastic but vague. Choice D is a generic summary that does not carry forward the essay's specific insight.