Drill 6 ยท
AP Cybersecurity Drill 6: Records-Room Physical Controls is a practice drill. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
An office manager reviews the access and visitor controls protecting a paper records room and decides how to strengthen them; this drill uses an invented company and original figures.
Brenncourt Title & Escrow keeps signed closing files in a locked records room. The office manager writes up the room's current controls and the procedures staff actually follow:
| Control area | Current state |
|---|---|
| Door | A single door with a key lock; three employees carry a physical key. |
| Access list | No written list of who may enter; anyone who finds a key can open the door. |
| Visitors | Couriers and contractors are walked to the room by whichever employee is free; no visitor log is kept. |
| Records | Files are stored open on shelves; nothing tracks which file was removed or by whom. |
| After hours | The cleaning crew is given a copy of the room key so they can empty the trash. |
The manager wants the room to enforce least privilege: only people who need closing files should be able to reach them, and every entry should be attributable to a specific person.
Question 1. Which control model best describes how the manager wants entry to the records room to work?
Explanation: Choice D is correct. Granting entry based on whether a person's job role requires closing files is role-based access control (RBAC), which matches the manager's least-privilege goal of limiting the room to those who need it. Choice A is incorrect. Open access is the opposite of least privilege and is the weakness the manager is trying to fix. Choice B is incorrect. Letting individual keyholders decide who else may enter spreads access informally and undermines a consistent need-to-enter rule. Choice C is incorrect. Labeling files by sensitivity is a data-classification step, not a model for who is authorized to open the door.
Question 2. The cleaning crew is given a copy of the room key. Which change best applies the principle of least privilege here?
Explanation: Choice C is correct. The crew needs to remove trash, not unsupervised standing access to closing files; having a keyholder admit and accompany them gives just enough access for the task and keeps entry attributable. Choice A is incorrect. A master key vastly expands the crew's access and worsens the least-privilege problem rather than fixing it. Choice B is incorrect. A verbal request does not remove the standing access a copied key grants, so the underlying over-permission remains. Choice D is incorrect. Refusing to empty the trash is an unnecessary disruption when supervised access solves the problem.
Question 3. Which change would most improve the office's ability to hold a specific person accountable for entering the room?
Explanation: Choice B is correct. A badge reader that logs each entry by badge and time, paired with a signed visitor log, ties every entry to an identifiable person and is the core of accountability. Choice A is incorrect. Signage may deter casually but records nothing and does not attribute entries. Choice C is incorrect. A second key lock still uses shared, unlogged keys, so it adds friction without identifying who entered. Choice D is incorrect. Relocating the room does not create any record of who goes in.
Question 4. After badge entry is installed, which review activity would most directly help the office detect misuse of the records room?
Explanation: Choice A is correct. Reviewing the entry log for unusual timing or unexpected badge holders turns the recorded data into actual detection of possible misuse. Choice B is incorrect. A daily file count might reveal a missing file but not who accessed the room or when, so it is weak for detecting misuse. Choice C is incorrect. A yearly self-report relies on the offender to volunteer wrongdoing and is not a reliable detection method. Choice D is incorrect. Confirming the door is locked checks the control's state but reveals nothing about who entered or when.
Question 5. Considering the whole write-up, which combination of changes most completely moves the room toward least privilege and accountability?
Explanation: Choice D is correct. Restricting access to the roles that need it, escorting and logging visitors, and recording file removals together enforce least privilege and make both entry and file handling attributable. Choice A is incorrect. A visitor log alone leaves the shared, unrestricted keys and untracked files unaddressed. Choice B is incorrect. A stronger lock on a shared, unlogged key does not narrow who has access or record entries. Choice C is incorrect. Giving everyone a key maximizes access and is the opposite of least privilege.