Drill 5 ยท
AP Cybersecurity Drill 5: Physical Security Observations is a practice drill. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
An observer logs entrance behaviors at a lab and identifies the physical-security weaknesses; this drill uses an invented company and original figures.
An observer records entrance activity at the badge-controlled door of Stannett Optics Lab over one morning.
| Time | Observation |
|---|---|
| 08:05 | A person enters close behind a badged employee without badging in. |
| 08:20 | A visitor watches an employee type the door PIN and repeats the digits aloud. |
| 08:41 | The door is propped open with a chair and left unattended for about 30 minutes. |
| 09:10 | A delivery driver is buzzed in by staff after showing a clipboard. |
Every employee at the lab carries a valid badge, and the door normally requires a badge to open.
Question 1. At 08:05, a person enters behind a badged employee without badging. What is this behavior called?
Explanation: Choice A is correct. Following a badged person through a door without badging in is tailgating. Choice B is incorrect. Phishing is a deceptive message that tricks a user, not a physical entry behavior. Choice C is incorrect. Shoulder surfing is watching someone enter secret information, which is the 08:20 event, not this one. Choice D is incorrect. Spoofing is faking an identity or address electronically, not walking in behind someone.
Question 2. The 08:20 observation, in which a visitor watches an employee type the door PIN and repeats it aloud, is an example of which weakness?
Explanation: Choice C is correct. Watching someone enter a secret such as a PIN and capturing it is shoulder surfing. Choice A is incorrect. Tailgating is following someone through a door, which is the 08:05 event. Choice B is incorrect. A denial-of-service condition blocks a service's availability and has nothing to do with watching a PIN. Choice D is incorrect. A buffer overflow is a software memory attack, unrelated to observing a PIN entry.
Question 3. Which single observation most clearly defeats the purpose of the badge reader for the longest period of time?
Explanation: Choice B is correct. A door propped open for about 30 minutes lets anyone enter unbadged for that whole window, defeating the badge reader far longer than the brief, single-person events. Choice A is incorrect. Shoulder surfing the PIN is serious but is a momentary observation, not a sustained open door. Choice C is incorrect. Tailgating admits one extra person once, not a 30-minute gap. Choice D is incorrect. Buzzing in a driver is a single supervised entry, not a prolonged bypass.
Question 4. Why is the 08:41 propped-open door a serious risk even though every employee at the lab has a valid badge?
Explanation: Choice D is correct. While the door is propped, anyone can walk in without badging and without being recorded, so access control is effectively removed for that period regardless of employee badges. Choice A is incorrect. The harm is unauthorized physical entry, not merely a gap in the log. Choice B is incorrect. An open door is a risk whenever it is open, including busy daytime hours. Choice C is incorrect. The stimulus describes one controlled door, not a second interior checkpoint that would contain the risk.
Question 5. Which control would most directly address the tailgating seen at 08:05?
Explanation: Choice A is correct. An access control vestibule or turnstile physically admits one badged person per entry, which directly stops a second person from slipping in behind. Choice B is incorrect. Longer passwords address account security, not physical tailgating. Choice C is incorrect. A guest Wi-Fi network does nothing about who walks through the door. Choice D is incorrect. Encrypting server files protects data at rest, not the entrance.