📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

ACT English: Sentence Structure (Drill 2)

Drill 2 · English · Sentence Structure

0 / 5
Previous drill
Drill 1
Next drill
Drill 3
More Act English Sentence Structure drills
Drill 1 5 questions →
Drill 2 — current you are here
Drill 3 5 questions →

About This Drill

ACT English: Sentence Structure (Drill 2) is a English practice drill covering Sentence Structure. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Sentence Structure questions ask you to identify and fix dangling modifiers, run-ons, fragments, and faulty parallelism. This drill emphasizes run-ons and comma splices — the most frequently tested errors in this category — with passages that require distinguishing between correct and incorrect ways to join independent clauses.

Questions & Explanations

Passage Excerpt
Because the expedition had reached the summit, they encountered a sudden storm that forced them to abandon their camp and descend immediately.

Question 1. Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  • A) No Change (Because the expedition had reached the summit, they encountered a sudden storm)
  • B) Since the expedition had reached the summit, they encountered a sudden storm
  • C) After the expedition had reached the summit, they encountered a sudden storm ✓
  • D) The expedition had reached the summit, and they encountered a sudden storm

Explanation: Choice C is correct. The relationship between the two clauses is temporal — first they reached the summit, then the storm hit. "Because" (Choice A) implies a causal relationship: the storm happened as a result of reaching the summit, which is illogical. Choice B uses "since," which can imply causation in the same way. Choice C uses "after," which correctly signals the time sequence. Choice D uses a coordinating conjunction, which creates a grammatically acceptable sentence but conveys a weaker, less precise relationship between the two events — the subordinating conjunction "after" better captures the sequence.

Passage Excerpt
Although the new transit line cost twice as much as originally projected, it reduced downtown traffic congestion by nearly forty percent in its first year of operation.

Question 2. Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  • A) No Change (Although the new transit line cost twice as much as originally projected, it reduced downtown traffic congestion by nearly forty percent) ✓
  • B) Because the new transit line cost twice as much as originally projected, it reduced downtown traffic congestion by nearly forty percent, as the sentence presents it
  • C) The new transit line cost twice as much as originally projected, it reduced downtown traffic congestion by nearly forty percent
  • D) Since the new transit line cost twice as much as originally projected, it reduced downtown traffic congestion by nearly forty percent

Explanation: Choice A (No Change) is correct. The sentence expresses a contrast: despite the high cost, the transit line delivered strong results. "Although" is precisely the right subordinating conjunction for this concessive relationship. Choice B uses "because," which would make the cost the cause of the traffic reduction — an illogical claim. Choice C removes the subordinating conjunction entirely, creating a comma splice — two independent clauses joined only by a comma. Choice D uses "since," which most commonly implies causation or time passage, neither of which fits the contrast being expressed here.

Passage Excerpt
The foundation's mission is to fund research into rare diseases, providing scholarships for medical students, and the support of families affected by illness.

Question 3. Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  • A) No Change (providing scholarships for medical students, and the support of families affected by illness.)
  • B) provide scholarships for medical students, and support families affected by illness. ✓
  • C) to provide scholarships for medical students, and supporting families affected by illness.
  • D) providing scholarships for medical students, and to support families affected by illness.

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The sentence lists three things as objects of "to fund...to provide...and to support" — the infinitive "to" applies to all three through ellipsis once it has been established. The first element "to fund" sets the pattern: a bare infinitive (verb in base form). Choice B correctly gives all three elements the same form: "fund," "provide," and "support." Choice A mixes a gerund ("providing") with a noun phrase ("the support"), neither of which matches the infinitive already established. Choice C pairs an infinitive ("to provide") with a gerund ("supporting"), breaking the parallel. Choice D mixes a gerund ("providing") with an infinitive ("to support"), also non-parallel.

Passage Excerpt
The grant committee only awards funding to projects that demonstrate measurable community impact.

Question 4. Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  • A) No Change (only awards funding to projects that demonstrate measurable community impact.)
  • B) awards only funding to projects that demonstrate measurable community impact.
  • C) awards funding only to projects that demonstrate measurable community impact. ✓
  • D) awards funding to projects that only demonstrate measurable community impact.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. The word "only" is a limiting modifier — it should be placed immediately before the word or phrase it limits. The intended meaning is that the committee restricts its funding to a specific type of project. Choice C places "only" directly before "to projects," making it clear that projects with measurable community impact are the exclusive recipients. Choice A places "only" before "awards," implying the committee does nothing but award funding, which distorts the meaning. Choice B places "only" before "funding," suggesting the committee awards nothing except funding (not, say, recognition), which changes the focus. Choice D places "only" before "demonstrate," implying projects do nothing but demonstrate impact, again distorting the meaning.

Passage Excerpt
The historian argued that while the treaty was signed in 1848, its provisions were not fully enforced until the following decade.

Question 5. Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  • A) No Change (while the treaty was signed in 1848, its provisions were not fully enforced until the following decade.) ✓
  • B) although the treaty was signed in 1848, but its provisions were not fully enforced until the following decade, as the sentence is written.
  • C) the treaty was signed in 1848, however, its provisions were not fully enforced until the following decade.
  • D) while the treaty was signed in 1848; its provisions were not fully enforced until the following decade.

Explanation: Choice A (No Change) is correct. The original correctly uses "while" to introduce a subordinate clause expressing a temporal/concessive contrast, followed by a comma and the main clause. This is a standard and correct construction. Choice B uses "although" and then adds the coordinating conjunction "but" — you cannot use both a subordinating conjunction ("although") and a coordinating conjunction ("but") to connect the same two clauses; this is called a double conjunction error. Choice C removes the subordinating conjunction entirely and replaces it with "however" without a preceding semicolon, creating a comma splice. Choice D uses a semicolon after the subordinate clause "while the treaty was signed in 1848," but a semicolon cannot separate a dependent clause from the main clause it modifies.