Drill 2 · Reading & Writing · Command of Evidence
SAT Reading & Writing: Command of Evidence (Drill 2) is a Reading & Writing practice drill covering Command of Evidence. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
Command of Evidence questions test your ability to use data from tables and graphs to support or challenge a claim. This drill focuses on paired quantitative evidence questions, where you must match a specific claim to the correct data point rather than a general trend.
Question 1. Which quotation from My Ántonia most effectively illustrates the claim?
Explanation: Choice B is the best answer because the quotation directly captures both elements of the claim. 'I felt erased, blotted out' conveys being overwhelmed by the emptiness of the landscape, while 'what would be would be' suggests a surrender to something larger than oneself, a sense of liberation through acceptance. Together these express the duality of freedom and overwhelm the claim describes. Choice A is incorrect because it offers a visual description of the prairie's color without addressing Jim's emotional response. Choice C is incorrect because it describes Ántonia's personality, not Jim's reaction to the landscape. Choice D is incorrect because it is a simple observation about a farm scene with no emotional content.
| Activity | First-Year Students | Second-Year Students | Third-Year Students | Fourth-Year Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attending class | 210 | 185 | 160 | 130 |
| Studying | 95 | 120 | 155 | 180 |
| Working (employment) | 30 | 65 | 105 | 140 |
| Socializing | 145 | 130 | 110 | 95 |
| Sleeping | 480 | 465 | 450 | 435 |
Question 2. Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the statement?
Explanation: Choice B is the best answer because the table shows class time declining from 210 (first-year) to 185 (second-year) to 160 (third-year) to 130 (fourth-year), a steady decrease that this choice accurately describes. Choice A is incorrect because it reverses the direction: class time decreased, not increased. Choice C is incorrect because the data shows a clear downward trend, not a constant value. Choice D is incorrect because it misidentifies which values are highest and lowest and confuses the direction of the figures.
Question 3. Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken Mensah's claim?
Explanation: Choice A is the best answer because Mensah claims griot performances are the primary means of acquiring historical knowledge. If the young people who attended performances also spent more time with elderly relatives who shared history at home, there is a plausible alternative explanation: their higher scores could result from family storytelling rather than (or in addition to) griot performances. This directly challenges the claim that griot performances are the primary source. Choice B is incorrect because practices in other countries don't address what happens in the Senegalese villages Mensah studied. Choice C is incorrect because the number of schools doesn't provide an alternative explanation for the specific correlation Mensah observed. Choice D is incorrect because how young people perceive the performances doesn't address whether griot performances are the primary source of their historical knowledge.
| Treatment | Avg. Height at Week 4 (cm) | Avg. Height at Week 8 (cm) | Avg. Fruit Yield (grams) | Avg. Root Mass (grams) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compost only | 18.3 | 42.7 | 310 | 8.4 |
| Synthetic fertilizer only | 24.1 | 45.2 | 345 | 6.1 |
| Compost + mycorrhizal fungi | 17.9 | 48.6 | 390 | 12.3 |
| Control (no treatment) | 12.5 | 28.4 | 175 | 5.8 |
Question 4. Which choice best describes data from the table that support Dasgupta's assertion?
Explanation: Choice C is the best answer because Dasgupta's assertion is that the compost plus fungi treatment produced the healthiest plants overall, and she defines overall health as including height, fruit production, and root development. Choice C cites data across all three relevant metrics, height at week 8 (48.6 cm, highest), fruit yield (390 g, highest), and root mass (12.3 g, highest), providing comprehensive support for the assertion. Choice A is incorrect because the compost plus fungi treatment did not produce the tallest plants at week 4 (synthetic fertilizer was taller at 24.1 cm), and it only addresses two metrics. Choice B is incorrect because it describes the synthetic fertilizer treatment, not the compost plus fungi treatment. Choice D is incorrect because data about the control group doesn't directly support Dasgupta's specific claim about the compost plus fungi treatment.
Question 5. Which finding, if true, would most directly support Osei's claim?
Explanation: Choice C is the best answer because Osei's claim specifically attributes the generational difference to English-language media (social media and streaming). Finding that younger speakers with high media engagement use far more loanwords than younger speakers with low engagement directly links media consumption to loanword usage, supporting Osei's proposed mechanism. Choice A is incorrect because while it shows the loanwords relate to technology and entertainment, it doesn't establish that media exposure is the cause. Choice B is incorrect because French-origin loanword usage among older speakers has no bearing on whether English-language media drives loanword adoption in younger speakers. Choice D is incorrect because English-language education has existed for decades and would affect both age groups, so it can't explain the generational difference Osei observed.