📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

AP U.S. History: Period 8 (1945–1980) (Drill 29)

Drill 29 · Multiple Choice · Period 8: 1945–1980

0 / 5
Previous drill
Drill 17
More Ap Us History Period 8 drills
Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions → Drill 17 5 questions →
Drill 29 — current you are here

About This Drill

AP U.S. History: Period 8 (1945–1980) (Drill 29) is a Multiple Choice practice drill covering Period 8: 1945–1980. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

This AP U.S. History Period 8 drill uses a modern historian's analysis of the 1970s as a decade of crisis and transformation. Questions address the historian's central argument, the collapse of the postwar liberal economic consensus, and why the 1970s are often overlooked in standard historical narratives.

Passage

The following is adapted from a modern historian's essay on the 1970s as a decade of crisis and transformation. The 1970s are the decade that American memory prefers to forget. Bookended by the triumphs of the 1960s civil rights legislation and the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s, the decade in between appears as a dispiriting interlude of failure: Vietnam, Watergate, stagflation, the hostage crisis, malaise. But this narrative of failure obscures the decade's genuine and lasting significance. The 1970s were the years in which the economic assumptions that had sustained the postwar liberal consensus finally collapsed under the weight of global competition, energy shocks, and deindustrialization. They were also the years in which the political coalition that had delivered civil rights legislation shattered, not because its goals were achieved, but because the economic anxieties of the white working class made them available to a new conservative politics that promised restoration rather than transformation.

Questions & Explanations

Question 1. The historian's argument that the 1970s are 'the decade that American memory prefers to forget' most directly challenges which of the following approaches to understanding this period?

  • A) the liberal historical narrative that emphasizes the achievements of the Carter administration in areas like energy policy, human rights, and environmental regulation
  • B) the social history approach that focuses on cultural transformations of the 1970s, feminism, environmentalism, gay rights, rather than economic and political developments
  • C) the conservative historical narrative that portrays the 1970s as a period of liberal policy failure that made the Reagan Revolution inevitable and necessary
  • D) the tendency to treat the 1970s as a transitional interlude between more significant decades rather than as a period of fundamental and lasting structural change ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct. The historian directly challenges the framing of the 1970s as a 'dispiriting interlude' sandwiched between more important decades. By calling it 'the decade that American memory prefers to forget' and then arguing for its 'genuine and lasting significance,' he is specifically rejecting the transitional-interlude interpretation in favor of a view that the 1970s were themselves a decisive turning point in American economic and political history. Choice C is incorrect. The conservative narrative that makes the Reagan Revolution inevitable actually gives the 1970s causal importance as the failure that necessitated Reagan; it does not forget the decade. The historian's challenge is to the view that the decade lacks significance, not to the conservative interpretation of that significance. Choice A is incorrect. The historian does not specifically engage or challenge Carter administration achievements. His argument is about the decade's structural economic and political transformations, not about evaluating Carter's policy record. Choice B is incorrect. The historian's argument is actually focused on economic and political developments rather than cultural ones; he is the social/economic historian in this framing. He is not challenging social history approaches; he is making a structural economic and political argument.

Question 2. The historian's argument that 'the economic assumptions that had sustained the postwar liberal consensus finally collapsed' most directly refers to which of the following developments of the 1970s?

  • A) the Nixon administration's decision to abandon the Bretton Woods international monetary system in 1971, which ended the dollar's convertibility to gold and unleashed global currency volatility
  • B) the combination of stagflation, oil shocks, deindustrialization, and global competition that undermined the Keynesian economic model underlying postwar liberal prosperity ✓
  • C) the federal government's budget deficits accumulated during the Great Society and Vietnam War years, which produced the inflation that discredited liberal fiscal policy
  • D) the growing power of public sector unions, whose wage demands and work rules reduced government efficiency and contributed to the fiscal crises of state and local governments

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The historian specifically names multiple converging factors, 'global competition, energy shocks, and deindustrialization', as the forces that collapsed the postwar economic assumptions. The Keynesian model that had managed the postwar boom assumed that government could fine-tune the economy through fiscal and monetary policy, but stagflation (simultaneous high inflation and high unemployment) was precisely the condition Keynesian theory said could not exist, and could not cure. Together with oil shocks and deindustrialization, this collapse of Keynesian economic management discredited the liberal economic consensus. Choice A is incorrect. The end of Bretton Woods in 1971 is a significant contributing factor, but the historian's broader argument encompasses the full range of structural economic failures he names, not a single monetary policy change. Choice C is incorrect. While Great Society and Vietnam War deficits did contribute to inflationary pressures, the historian's argument is about the structural collapse of the postwar economic model, not primarily about fiscal irresponsibility producing inflation. Choice D is incorrect. Public sector union power was a real political issue of the 1970s, particularly visible in New York City's fiscal crisis, but it is one component of the broader economic transformation the historian describes, not its primary cause.

Question 3. The historian's claim that the liberal political coalition 'shattered' in the 1970s because 'the economic anxieties of the white working class made them available to a new conservative politics' most directly describes which of the following political phenomena?

  • A) the emergence of the Sunbelt as a Republican political stronghold, as millions of Americans migrated from the industrial Northeast and Midwest to the South and West
  • B) the defection of white working-class Northern Democrats, the 'Reagan Democrats', who had supported New Deal economic liberalism but felt culturally and economically abandoned by the Democratic Party ✓
  • C) the growth of the evangelical Christian political movement, which mobilized millions of previously apolitical conservative Christians through organizations like the Moral Majority
  • D) the decline of organized labor as deindustrialization reduced union membership, weakening the institutional backbone of the New Deal Democratic coalition

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The 'Reagan Democrats' phenomenon, white working-class Northern voters who had reliably supported the New Deal Democratic coalition but switched to Reagan in 1980, is precisely the political development the historian describes. Their defection resulted from economic anxieties (job losses, inflation, deindustrialization) combined with cultural resentments over busing, affirmative action, and the perception that the Democratic Party prioritized minority and elite concerns over white working-class interests. Choice A is incorrect. Sunbelt migration is a real component of conservative realignment, but it represents a geographic shift in population rather than the specific defection of previously Democratic working-class voters that the historian describes. Sunbelt conservatives were often already Republican or had not been part of the New Deal coalition. Choice C is incorrect. The evangelical political mobilization through the Moral Majority was driven primarily by cultural and religious concerns, abortion, prayer in schools, gay rights, rather than the economic anxieties the historian identifies as the specific mechanism of white working-class defection. Choice D is incorrect. Union decline did weaken the Democratic institutional coalition, but the historian's specific argument is about the economic anxieties that made working-class voters 'available to a new conservative politics', a voter defection argument, not an institutional decline argument.

Question 4. The 'energy shocks' the historian references as contributing to the collapse of postwar economic assumptions most directly refers to which of the following events?

  • A) the OPEC oil embargo of 1973, in which Arab oil-producing nations cut off petroleum exports to the United States and other nations that had supported Israel in the Yom Kippur War ✓
  • B) the Three Mile Island nuclear accident of 1979, which devastated public confidence in nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels and derailed the expansion of nuclear energy
  • C) the Carter administration's deregulation of natural gas prices in 1978, which dramatically increased home heating costs for working-class Americans and contributed to inflationary pressures
  • D) the decline of American domestic oil production after 1970, which made the United States increasingly dependent on Middle Eastern oil imports and vulnerable to supply disruptions

Explanation: Choice A is correct. The OPEC oil embargo of 1973 is the primary 'energy shock' of the 1970s; it quadrupled oil prices virtually overnight, produced gas lines across the United States, and delivered a devastating blow to an economy that had been built on cheap energy. A second oil shock followed in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution. These shocks were central to the stagflation that discredited Keynesian economics and undermined American confidence in the postwar prosperity model. Choice B is incorrect. Three Mile Island was a significant event that shaped energy policy debates, but it was not an 'energy shock' in the economic sense the historian uses the term. It affected public opinion about nuclear power, not the macroeconomic conditions that the historian identifies as collapsing the postwar liberal consensus. Choice C is incorrect. Natural gas deregulation was a policy response to energy problems, not itself an energy shock. It also occurred in 1978, within Carter's presidency, rather than being the cause of the decade's economic difficulties. Choice D is incorrect. While the decline of American domestic oil production after 1970 increased vulnerability to foreign supply disruptions, it was the actual OPEC embargo that constituted the specific 'shock', the sudden, dramatic disruption of supply and price spike, that the historian's argument references.

Question 5. Which of the following most directly supports the historian's argument that the 1970s had 'genuine and lasting significance' rather than being merely a transitional decade?

  • A) the Watergate scandal and Nixon's resignation in 1974, which permanently damaged public trust in government and produced long-lasting cynicism about political institutions
  • B) the fundamental restructuring of the American economy from manufacturing to services and finance that began in the 1970s and permanently transformed the class structure of American society ✓
  • C) the passage of significant environmental legislation including the Clean Air Act amendments of 1970 and the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency, which established lasting regulatory frameworks
  • D) the demographic changes of the decade, including declining birth rates and increasing women's workforce participation, which permanently altered American family structure and labor markets

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The deindustrialization that began in the 1970s, the permanent decline of manufacturing employment in the industrial Midwest and Northeast and the shift toward a service and finance economy, is the most direct and lasting structural change of the decade. This transformation permanently altered the occupational structure, geographic distribution, and class composition of American society in ways that are still visible today, making it the clearest evidence for the historian's claim about lasting significance. Choice A is incorrect. While Watergate did produce lasting cynicism about government, it is primarily a political scandal rather than a structural economic transformation. The historian's argument about lasting significance centers on economic and structural change, not on political events. Choice C is incorrect. Environmental legislation was genuinely significant and lasting, but it predates the decade's economic crisis and represents policy achievement rather than the structural economic transformation at the center of the historian's argument. Choice D is incorrect. Demographic changes in birth rates and women's workforce participation are real and lasting developments, but they reflect broader long-term trends that were not specifically products of the 1970s' particular economic crisis. The historian's argument is specifically about the collapse of the postwar economic model, not demographic trends.