Drill 29 · Multiple Choice · Unit 5: Mental and Physical Health
Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.
AP Psychology: Categories of Psychological Disorders (Part 2) (Drill 29) is a Multiple Choice practice drill covering Unit 5: Mental and Physical Health. It contains 5 original questions developed by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
AP Psychology practice questions on schizophrenia spectrum disorders, personality disorders, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Scenario-based AP exam prep covering positive and negative symptoms, personality disorder clusters, and neurodevelopmental features including ADHD and autism spectrum disorder.
Question 1. Over the past year, a 22-year-old college student has become increasingly withdrawn. He tells his roommate that a government agency is transmitting messages to him through the campus Wi-Fi, and he sometimes speaks in sentences that start on one topic and end on an unrelated one. He has also stopped showering regularly and shows little emotional expression in conversations. Which combination of symptom types is present in this presentation?
Explanation: The delusions (government transmissions) and disorganized speech are positive symptoms, additions to normal experience, while the social withdrawal, poor hygiene, and flat affect are negative symptoms, reductions in normal functioning. Schizophrenia spectrum disorders in AP Psychology are characterized by the presence of positive and/or negative symptoms, and both are clearly present here. (A) is wrong because ignoring the negative symptoms misses half the clinical picture; (B) is wrong for the mirror-image reason. (D) is the true-but-irrelevant distractor: dissociative symptoms are a real category, but nothing in the stem describes identity disruption, amnesia, or depersonalization, students sometimes pick this because "withdrawn" sounds dissociative, which is a misconception. [Practice 1]
Question 2. Which of the following best distinguishes obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)?
Explanation: OCPD is a personality disorder: a long-standing pattern of perfectionism, orderliness, and need for control that the person usually sees as reasonable or even virtuous. OCD, by contrast, involves obsessions and compulsions that the person typically experiences as intrusive and unwanted. Confusing OCD and OCPD is one of the most common errors on AP Psychology, which is why they sit in separate categories. (B) introduces hallucinations, which belong to the schizophrenia spectrum, not either disorder here. (D) is a flat misconception; they are separate disorders. (C) is factually false; both can be diagnosed in adulthood. [Practice 1]
Question 3. A child psychologist evaluates a 7-year-old who has difficulty sustaining attention during schoolwork, frequently interrupts peers, struggles to stay seated during group activities, and often loses materials needed for tasks. Symptoms have been present since at least age 5, occur both at home and at school, and cause significant difficulty in daily functioning. Which category of psychological disorder best fits?
Explanation: The child shows inattentive features (difficulty sustaining attention, losing materials) and hyperactive-impulsive features (interrupting, not staying seated) beginning in early childhood, present in multiple settings, and causing impairment, the profile of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, a neurodevelopmental disorder in AP Psychology. (C) is the true-but-irrelevant distractor: autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder often discussed alongside ADHD, but its defining features are persistent deficits in social communication and restricted, repetitive behaviors, none of which the stem describes. (A) focuses on domain-specific academic deficits in reading, math, or writing, which are not mentioned. (D) involves a pattern of defiant, vindictive behavior toward authority figures, which is also absent. [Practice 1]
Question 4. A team of researchers wants to investigate whether the heritability of schizophrenia is higher than the heritability of antisocial personality disorder. They collect concordance-rate data from monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs where at least one twin has the disorder. Which of the following would most strongly support the claim that schizophrenia has a larger genetic component than antisocial personality disorder?
Explanation: Twin studies estimate heritability by comparing MZ twins (who share nearly 100% of their genes) with DZ twins (who share about 50%); a larger MZ–DZ concordance gap implies a stronger genetic contribution. If that gap is bigger for schizophrenia than for antisocial personality disorder, that is direct evidence of a larger genetic component. (B) is the true-but-irrelevant distractor: base rates are genuine epidemiological facts, but they say nothing about heritability, a disorder can be rare and largely environmental, or common and largely genetic. (C) would actually argue against a strong genetic contribution, which is the reverse of what's asked. (D) concerns help-seeking behavior, not genetic contribution. [Practice 2]
Question 5. The table below shows concordance rates (the probability that the second twin has the disorder given that the first one does) for four disorders:
| Disorder | MZ concordance | DZ concordance |
|---|---|---|
| Schizophrenia | 48% | 17% |
| Bipolar I disorder | 40% | 7% |
| Major depressive disorder | 38% | 20% |
| Autism spectrum disorder | 60% | 10% |
Explanation: Every row shows higher MZ than DZ concordance, which is the standard twin-study signature of a genetic contribution. The largest MZ–DZ gaps are for autism spectrum disorder (50 points) and bipolar I disorder (33 points), so (B) accurately summarizes what the numbers actually show and names the reasoning behind the conclusion. (A) overstates, concordance below 100% in MZ twins actually indicates that environment also matters, so genetics cannot be the whole story. (C) is wrong because major depressive disorder still has a meaningful MZ–DZ gap (18 points), indicating some genetic contribution even if it is smaller than the others. (D) is the true-but-irrelevant distractor: it is true that MZ concordance is below 100% for every disorder, and that point is genuinely used to argue for environmental influence, but concluding "genetics is irrelevant" reverses the direction of that evidence and ignores the clear MZ-over-DZ pattern. This question connects twin-study methods (research methods) to disorder categories (Unit 5). [Practice 3]