📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams
About Contact Blog Privacy Policy

AP English Language: Reasoning and Organization (Drill 1)

Drill 1 · Reading · Reasoning and Organization

0 / 5
Next drill
Drill 2
→
More Ap English Language Reasoning And Organization drills
Drill 1 — current you are here
Drill 2 5 questions →

About This Drill

AP English Language: Reasoning and Organization (Drill 1) is a Reading practice drill covering Reasoning and Organization. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Read the passage carefully, then answer all five questions. Reasoning and Organization questions ask you to analyze how a writer structures an argument, uses transitions, organizes evidence, and guides the reader through lines of reasoning.

Passage

The following text is adapted from a modern essay on the gig economy and the rhetoric of flexibility. The word flexibility appears in nearly every defense of the gig economy. Drivers choose their own hours. Delivery workers set their own schedules. Freelancers work when they want. The implication is that gig work offers something traditional employment does not: freedom from the fixed constraints of the nine-to-five. What this framing obscures is that flexibility, in the context of gig work, flows almost entirely in one direction. Platforms are flexible. Workers are not. A rideshare company can adjust surge pricing in real time, redirect demand to new markets, and exit unprofitable regions without notice. The driver, meanwhile, cannot negotiate a minimum hourly rate, cannot demand two weeks' notice before a policy change, and cannot file a grievance when the algorithm reduces their earnings. The celebrated flexibility of gig work is, on close inspection, the platform's flexibility to manage labor costs without the obligations that traditional employment law imposes. Workers experience this not as freedom but as exposure. The data support this characterization more clearly than the rhetoric does. A 2017 study by the Federal Reserve found that nearly a third of gig workers reported that their income varied so unpredictably that they could not reliably cover basic expenses. A separate analysis by economists at Princeton and Harvard found that the majority of gig workers in transportation and delivery earned less than minimum wage once vehicle costs, maintenance, and unpaid waiting time were factored in. These are not the earnings of workers who have chosen flexibility over stability. These are the earnings of workers who were offered flexibility because stability was too expensive to provide. None of this is to say that gig work serves no legitimate purpose. For some workers, those with primary employment seeking supplemental income, those with caregiving responsibilities that make fixed schedules impossible, those for whom any income source is preferable to none, gig work can be genuinely useful. The error is not in the existence of gig platforms but in the political and legal framing that treats them as a new category of worker freedom rather than as a new method of externalizing labor costs. The question worth asking is not whether workers prefer flexibility, many do, in surveys, but whether the flexibility they are offered is actually what they would choose if they had more options. When researchers have given gig workers the hypothetical choice between their current arrangement and a traditional employment relationship with comparable pay, benefits, and schedule flexibility, the majority choose the traditional arrangement. The preference for gig work, it turns out, is largely a preference for the only thing being offered.

Questions & Explanations

Question 1. The overall structure of the essay is best described as

  • A) a personal narrative about the author's own gig work that builds gradually toward a single policy recommendation.
  • B) an argument that exposes a misleading framing, supports the critique with evidence, qualifies it, and sharpens it with a final reframing. ✓
  • C) a point-by-point rebuttal of specific claims made by gig economy companies in their public statements.
  • D) a comparison of gig work and traditional employment that ultimately concludes both have significant drawbacks.

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The author opens by identifying 'flexibility' as a misleading framing (paragraph 1), develops the critique (paragraph 2), supports it with data (paragraph 3), qualifies the argument (paragraph 4), and ends with a reframing of what worker preference actually reveals (paragraph 5). This is a layered argumentative structure. Choice A is incorrect: the essay contains no personal narrative. Choice C misidentifies the target; the author critiques a general framing, not specific company claims. Choice D mischaracterizes the conclusion; the author does not conclude that both arrangements have equal drawbacks.

Question 2. The second paragraph's contrast between what platforms can do and what workers cannot do primarily serves to

  • A) provide specific legal examples of employment protections that Congress should extend to gig workers.
  • B) concede that platforms have legitimate business reasons for the asymmetric structure of gig arrangements within this context.
  • C) introduce the essay's argument that gig workers should organize into unions to counter platforms.
  • D) demonstrate concretely that the flexibility celebrated in gig work benefits platforms far more than workers. ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct. The paragraph itemizes what platforms can do (adjust pricing, redirect demand, exit markets) against what workers cannot do (negotiate rates, demand notice, file grievances), making the asymmetry of 'flexibility' visible and specific. Choice A is incorrect: no legislative recommendations are made. Choice B misreads the tone; the paragraph is critical of the asymmetry, not conceding its legitimacy. Choice C introduces a union argument not present in the passage.

Question 3. The third paragraph's citation of studies from the Federal Reserve and Princeton and Harvard economists primarily functions to

  • A) ground the essay's rhetorical critique in quantitative evidence that the flexibility framing obscures workers' actual earnings and instability. ✓
  • B) introduce a counterargument that gig work provides income opportunities unavailable in traditional labor markets.
  • C) shift the essay's register from economic analysis to personal advocacy for a specific set of worker protections.
  • D) establish the author's academic credentials by demonstrating familiarity with peer-reviewed labor research.

Explanation: Choice A is correct. After two paragraphs of rhetorical and logical analysis, the author pivots to data, income unpredictability and sub-minimum-wage earnings, to show that the 'flexibility' framing is not merely misleading in theory but demonstrably harmful in practice. The evidence supports the critique developed in paragraphs one and two. Choice B is incorrect: the studies are cited to support the critique, not to introduce a counterargument. Choice C misidentifies the shift; the paragraph is data-driven, not a move toward personal advocacy. Choice D misreads the function; credentialing is not the primary purpose of citing research in an argumentative essay.

Question 4. The fourth paragraph's acknowledgment that gig work 'serves no legitimate purpose' for some workers most likely serves to

  • A) introduce new evidence that complicates the data cited in the previous paragraph.
  • B) signal that the essay will pivot in the final paragraph toward a defense of gig platforms.
  • C) prevent the essay's argument from being misread as a blanket condemnation of gig work's existence. ✓
  • D) concede that the majority of gig workers are satisfied with their current employment arrangements.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. The author explicitly carves out cases where gig work is genuinely useful, supplemental earners, caregivers, those with no other options, before clarifying that her critique targets the political and legal framing, not the existence of gig platforms. This qualification sharpens the argument by narrowing its target. Choice A is incorrect: no new evidence is introduced. Choice B misreads the direction; the essay's final paragraph sharpens the critique, it does not defend platforms. Choice D overstates the concession; the author identifies specific groups for whom gig work is useful, not a majority of workers.

Question 5. The final paragraph's argument that gig workers' expressed preference for flexibility reflects 'a preference for the only thing being offered' primarily functions to

  • A) reframe worker survey data as evidence of constrained choice rather than genuine preference, reinforcing the essay's central critique. ✓
  • B) introduce a new empirical claim that contradicts the Federal Reserve study cited in the third paragraph.
  • C) shift the essay's conclusion from economic critique to a call for expanding gig workers' legal rights.
  • D) concede that gig workers are ultimately responsible for accepting the working conditions they agree to.

Explanation: Choice A is correct. The author uses the hypothetical-choice research to reinterpret the survey data that gig economy defenders cite, worker preference for flexibility, as an artifact of limited options rather than genuine preference. This is the essay's final and most pointed reframing. Choice B misses the mark: the final paragraph does not contradict the earlier data; it extends the argument. Choice C is off because no legal rights claim is made in the final paragraph. Choice D inverts the passage's logic; the author argues workers' choices are constrained by what is available, not that they bear responsibility for accepting it.