📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams
About Contact Blog Privacy Policy

AP English Language: Mixed Skills II (Drill 2)

Drill 2 · Reading · Mixed Skills II

0 / 5
←
Previous drill
Drill 1
Next drill
Drill 3
→
More Ap English Language Mixed Skills Ii drills
Drill 1 5 questions →
Drill 2 — current you are here
Drill 3 5 questions → Drill 4 5 questions → Drill 5 5 questions → Drill 6 5 questions →

About This Drill

AP English Language: Mixed Skills II (Drill 2) is a Reading practice drill covering Mixed Skills II. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Mixed Skills II drills feature more challenging passages, historical documents, speeches, and complex argumentative prose. This drill uses a 19th-century address, with questions that test your ability to read archaic syntax accurately and identify the rhetorical work being done by formal diction and periodic sentence structure.

Passage

The following text is adapted from a modern essay on memory, reconstruction, and how people misunderstand their own recollections. Memory is not a filing cabinet. This is the first and most important thing cognitive science has established about how human beings remember, and it is a finding that most people, including most people who know it, continue to disbelieve in their daily lives. We speak of memories as if they are stored objects, retrieved intact: I have a clear memory of this. The memory is vivid. I can still see it. But what neuroscience has demonstrated, with increasing precision over the past four decades, is that memory is not retrieval. It is reconstruction. Every time you remember an event, you are not replaying a recording. You are rebuilding it, drawing on fragments of encoded experience, filling gaps with plausible inference, and coloring the whole with your current emotional state and knowledge. The memory that emerges is not the event. It is a representation of the event assembled in the present, shaped by everything that has happened to you since. This means that memories change each time they are recalled. The act of remembering is also, necessarily, an act of revision. The implications of this finding reach far beyond the laboratory. Eyewitness testimony, long treated by courts as among the most persuasive forms of evidence, rests on the assumption that witnesses store what they saw and retrieve it accurately under questioning. Decades of research by psychologist Elizabeth Loftus and others have demonstrated that witnesses are instead highly susceptible to post-event suggestion: questions asked during police interviews, news coverage of a case, conversations with other witnesses, all can alter what a witness reports remembering, often without any conscious awareness that alteration has occurred. The finding creates a genuine epistemological puzzle. If memory is reconstructive, and if each reconstruction is shaped by subsequent experience, then the memory of an event that has been frequently recalled over many years may bear only a loose resemblance to the event itself. The memories we hold most confidently, the ones we have told and retold, the ones we have shaped into narrative, may be the most thoroughly revised. Confidence, in memory, is not a reliable indicator of accuracy. This does not mean that memory is useless or that we should distrust all testimony. It means that memory is a human capacity with human limitations, powerful, essential, and imperfect in ways that matter. Understanding those limitations is not an invitation to nihilism. It is a precondition for using memory wisely: in courts, in therapy, in history, and in the stories we tell about ourselves.

Questions & Explanations

Question 1. The primary purpose of the essay is to

  • A) explain the reconstructive nature of memory and draw out its implications for how we understand and use memory in consequential contexts. ✓
  • B) argue that eyewitness testimony should be permanently excluded from criminal trials due to its inherent unreliability.
  • C) summarize Elizabeth Loftus's research on post-event suggestion and its influence on cognitive science.
  • D) challenge the assumption that scientific knowledge about human memory is accessible to general audiences.

Explanation: Choice A is correct. The author moves from the core scientific finding (memory is reconstructive, not reproductive) through its implications for eyewitness testimony and epistemology, and concludes with a practical framing of what understanding memory's limitations enables. Choice B overstates the prescription; the author does not call for excluding eyewitness testimony, only for understanding its limits. Choice C is too narrow; Loftus appears in one paragraph as supporting evidence within a larger argument. Choice D is contradicted by the essay's tone and purpose, which is to communicate a scientific finding accessibly.

Question 2. The opening sentence; 'Memory is not a filing cabinet', functions primarily as

  • A) an acknowledgment that early cognitive scientists held an oversimplified view that has since been entirely abandoned.
  • B) an appeal to the reader's sense of humor, using an absurd comparison to make the essay feel approachable.
  • C) a direct refutation of the most common implicit metaphor for memory, setting up the essay's corrective argument. ✓
  • D) a transition from a prior discussion of storage models in cognitive science to a new framework.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. The filing cabinet metaphor captures the intuitive model most people hold, memories as stored objects retrieved intact, and the author immediately refutes it, framing the rest of the essay as a replacement of that model with the reconstructive one. Choice A introduces 'early cognitive scientists' not mentioned in the passage. Choice B misreads the tone; the sentence is direct and serious, not humorous. Choice D is incorrect: there is no prior discussion; this is the essay's opening sentence.

Question 3. The author's claim in the second paragraph that 'the act of remembering is also, necessarily, an act of revision' is best understood as

  • A) a metaphor comparing the process of remembering to the editing process used by writers and journalists.
  • B) a concession that while memory is reconstructive, the revisions it undergoes are typically minor and inconsequential.
  • C) an argument that people deliberately distort their memories to conform to self-serving narratives.
  • D) a logical consequence of the reconstructive model, if memory is rebuilt each time from fragments and inference, recall itself changes what is remembered. ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct. The author has established that memory is reconstruction rather than retrieval, assembled from fragments and inference in the present. The conclusion that follows necessarily is that each act of recall, by rebuilding the memory, also revises it. This is not a metaphor or a moral claim but a logical implication of the model. Choice A misidentifies it as metaphor; the author is making a cognitive claim. Choice B contradicts the passage's direction; the author argues that revisions can be substantial. Choice C introduces deliberate distortion; the author is describing an unconscious process, not intentional manipulation.

Question 4. The fourth paragraph's observation that 'the memories we hold most confidently...may be the most thoroughly revised' primarily serves to

  • A) introduce a counterargument that high-confidence memories are actually more reliable than low-confidence ones.
  • B) extend the essay's core finding to its most counterintuitive implication, that the markers we use to trust memories are unreliable guides to their accuracy. ✓
  • C) shift the essay's focus from the science of memory to the therapeutic implications of false memories.
  • D) concede that the reconstructive model of memory applies only to older, frequently recalled memories and not to recent ones.

Explanation: Choice B is correct. The paragraph pushes the reconstructive model to its most unsettling conclusion: the very features that make us trust a memory, vividness, confidence, narrative coherence, may be the product of repeated reconstruction rather than evidence of accuracy. This is the essay's most counterintuitive claim. Choice A inverts the argument; the author is arguing that confidence is unreliable, not reliable. Choice C is not supported; therapy is not mentioned. Choice D is a qualification the author does not make, the passage does not limit the finding to older memories.

Question 5. The final paragraph's assertion that understanding memory's limitations is 'not an invitation to nihilism' primarily serves to

  • A) introduce a new philosophical framework that the author develops in a later section of the essay.
  • B) concede that the reconstructive model of memory has been used irresponsibly by some researchers to undermine the credibility of trauma survivors as described in the passage.
  • C) shift the essay's tone from scientific analysis to personal reflection on the author's own relationship with memory.
  • D) preempt a predictable misreading of the argument, that if memory is unreliable, it cannot be trusted at all, and reframe the finding as enabling wiser use. ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct. The author anticipates the most likely objection to her argument: if memory is reconstructive and unreliable, does that mean we should distrust all memory-based knowledge? She preempts this by distinguishing between acknowledging limitations (useful) and abandoning trust in memory entirely (nihilism). This is a classic rhetorical move, closing off an unintended conclusion. Choice A is incorrect: no new section follows; this is the conclusion. Choice B introduces trauma survivors not mentioned in the passage. Choice C misidentifies the register; the paragraph is argumentative, not personally reflective.