Drill 4 ยท Science ยท Conflicting Viewpoints
ACT Science: Conflicting Viewpoints (Drill 4) is a Science practice drill covering Conflicting Viewpoints. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
ACT Conflicting Viewpoints questions present two competing scientific explanations for you to evaluate. In this drill, two scientists debate the evolution of powered bird flight, the trees-down hypothesis versus the ground-up hypothesis, requiring identification of assumptions and evaluation of hypothetical evidence.
Question 1. According to Scientist 1, what was the first functional step in the evolution of bird flight?
Explanation: Scientist 1 states: "once in the trees, gravity could assist locomotion: an animal spreading feathered limbs to glide downward gains both distance and speed at little energy cost." The aerodynamic efficiency of downward gliding from an elevated position is the core of the trees-down argument. Option B describes Scientist 2's mechanism (WAIR). Options C and D are not proposed by either scientist.
Question 2. Which of the following statements would both Scientist 1 and Scientist 2 most likely accept?
Explanation: The passage introduction states as agreed background: "feathers evolved in non-flying theropod dinosaurs before true powered flight appeared." This is established fossil evidence that both scientists build their arguments around -- Scientist 1 uses feathers as the basis for gliding, Scientist 2 uses feathers as the basis for WAIR and eventual powered flight. Both explicitly accept this timeline. Option A is Scientist 1's position only. Option B is Scientist 2's position only. Option D is contested -- Scientist 2 specifically states that claw curvature of early feathered theropods is "consistent with ground-dwelling birds rather than arboreal perching specialists," directly challenging this claim.
Question 3. Which of the following findings, if confirmed, would most weaken Scientist 1's hypothesis?
Explanation: Scientist 1 relies heavily on claw curvature as physical evidence that early bird ancestors were tree-climbers: "the strongly curved foot claws of Archaeopteryx and related forms are consistent with animals that perched and climbed." If careful quantitative analysis of claw curvature across the earliest feathered theropods shows values matching ground-dwelling birds rather than arboreal ones, this directly removes one of Scientist 1's central pieces of evidence for the arboreal lifestyle that the trees-down model requires. Option A actually supports Scientist 1's argument rather than weakening it. Option C supports Scientist 2's WAIR hypothesis. Option D supports Scientist 1 by reinforcing Microraptor's arboreal, gliding capabilities.
Question 4. Scientist 2's ground-up hypothesis depends on which of the following assumptions?
Explanation: Scientist 2 argues that flight evolved gradually from ground-running through incrementally improving stages. For natural selection to produce this sequence, each step along the way must have been advantageous -- otherwise selection would not favor the intermediate forms. Scientist 2 explicitly acknowledges this challenge and addresses it through WAIR: "WAIR demonstrates that proto-wings provide an immediate, selectively beneficial function for a ground-dwelling animal even before true flight is possible." This shows Scientist 2 understands that the assumption of intermediate-stage advantage is necessary for the hypothesis to work. Option A is too strong -- Scientist 2 does not claim tree-climbing was impossible, only that most ancestors were terrestrial. Option B contradicts agreed background in the passage (feathers evolved before flight). Option D contradicts a foundational fact both scientists accept.
Question 5. Researchers study a species of ground-dwelling juvenile bird that is not yet capable of powered flight. They find that the chicks use vigorous wing-flapping to run up near-vertical rock faces to escape predators, gaining traction they could not achieve with legs alone. This finding most directly supports the hypothesis of:
Explanation: This is precisely the WAIR behavior that Scientist 2 describes and cites as central evidence: "juvenile birds that cannot yet fly use vigorous wing-flapping to increase traction and run up nearly vertical inclines." Finding this behavior in a living ground-dwelling species confirms that proto-wings provide a selectively advantageous function on the ground before an animal can fly -- the key intermediate-stage problem that Scientist 2's hypothesis must solve. Scientist 1's trees-down model does not predict or require ground-based wing use; it predicts that wings first became useful for gliding from elevated positions. Option A misreads the scenario -- the chicks are using wings to run up surfaces, not to glide downward from trees. Option C overstates agreement: Scientist 1's model does not specifically predict this ground-based wing behavior.