📐 SAT
📝 ACT
🎓 AP Exams

AP World History Unit 5 Drill 14

Drill 14 · Multiple Choice · Unit 5: Revolutions

0 / 5
0/5 correct

Nice work!

Review your answers above to learn from any mistakes.

Previous drill
Drill 13
Next drill
Drill 15
More Ap World History Unit 5 drills
Drill 13 5 questions →
Drill 14 — current you are here
Drill 15 5 questions → Drill 16 5 questions →

About This Drill

AP World History Unit 5 Drill 14 is a Multiple Choice practice drill covering Unit 5: Revolutions. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

This drill focuses on how nationalism became a major force shaping states and empires from c. 1750 to c. 1900, driving both independence movements and attempts at national unification. Read the passage carefully, then answer all five questions.

Passage

Adapted from a modern historian's analysis of nineteenth-century nationalism.

"Nationalism was among the most powerful and destructive forces of the nineteenth century. At its heart was a deceptively simple idea: that legitimate political authority derives from a people sharing a common identity — language, history, culture, or religion — and that such a people constitutes a 'nation' entitled to self-governance within its own state. This idea was explosive because it simultaneously justified independence movements against multinational empires and provided the ideological fuel for ethnic exclusion and conflict. Where nationalists succeeded — in Greece, in Germany, in Italy, in the Americas — they remade the political map. Where the same logic was applied to diverse empires like the Ottoman or Austro-Hungarian, it was a force of dissolution rather than creation. The same idea that united could equally divide."

Questions in This Drill

  1. Which of the following best states the historian's central argument about nationalism?
  2. The historian describes nationalism as capable of simultaneously justifying independence movements and providing "fuel for ethnic exclusion and conflict." This claim would be best supported by evidence of
  3. The historian's examples of nationalist success — Greece, Germany, Italy, and the Americas — are best understood in the context of which broader development?
  4. The historian argues that nationalism was "a force of dissolution" in multinational empires like the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian. Which historical example best illustrates this dynamic?
  5. Which of the following developments after 1900 most directly continued the pattern the historian describes?