Drill 1 · Multiple Choice · Period 1: 1491–1607
AP U.S. History: Period 1 (1491–1607) (Drill 1) is a Multiple Choice practice drill covering Period 1: 1491–1607. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.
This AP U.S. History Period 1 drill is based on an adapted excerpt from Bartolomé de las Casas's A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies (1542). Questions test historical context, authorial argument, rhetorical choices, sourcing, and the broader significance of Spanish colonization and Indigenous resistance.
Question 1. Bartolomé de las Casas's use of the phrase "wolves, tigers, and lions" to describe Spanish conquistadors primarily serves to
Explanation: Choice D is correct. De las Casas uses this animal metaphor to convey the ferocity and predatory brutality of Spanish conquistadors against what he describes as 'gentle' and 'innocent' native peoples. The contrast between the savage metaphor and his characterization of the Indigenous population amplifies the moral indictment. Choice A is incorrect. De las Casas is making a moral argument about cruelty, not a critique of military training or governance capacity. Choice B is incorrect. While de las Casas criticizes Spanish actions, the passage does not claim the Crown deliberately authorized brutality; he is appealing to the king to reform colonial practices, which assumes the Crown has the power and responsibility to act. Choice C is incorrect. De las Casas is not arguing that colonization became uncontrollable due to absent royal oversight. He is writing directly to the king demanding action; his argument assumes the Crown can and should intervene, not that it lacks authority.
Question 2. The argument made by de las Casas in this passage is best described as
Explanation: Choice B is correct. Historians broadly agree that the shift from indentured servitude to enslaved African labor in the Chesapeake resulted from a combination of declining indentured servant immigration, rising life expectancy (which made lifetime enslaved labor more economically attractive), and growing anxieties about the political dangers posed by large numbers of armed, landless former servants, anxieties sharpened by Bacon's Rebellion of 1676. Choice A is incorrect. While the argument that former servants could no longer easily acquire frontier land has some historical basis, this explanation runs in the wrong direction: it was the shortage of new indentured servants willing to come, combined with the rising cost and limited duration of indenture contracts, that pushed planters toward enslaved labor, not that servants were succeeding too well on the frontier. Choice C is incorrect. The shift to enslaved labor was driven primarily by colonial planters' economic decisions, not imperial directives. The British Crown did not issue policy mandating the change. Choice D is incorrect. While Dutch traders were involved in early slave sales to Virginia, the passage does not suggest they were the primary cause of the transition, and attributing this major structural shift to a single trading relationship oversimplifies the broader economic and demographic forces at work.
Question 3. The historical context most directly relevant to de las Casas's 1542 account was
Explanation: Choice B is correct. The encomienda system is the direct institutional context for de las Casas's critique. Under this system, Spanish colonizers were granted Indigenous laborers and justified it through Christian conversion obligations, precisely the arrangement de las Casas argues produced catastrophic exploitation and death. Choice A is incorrect. While the Reformation was occurring simultaneously, de las Casas's argument is rooted in Catholic moral theology, not a response to Protestant challenges. Choice C is incorrect. Spanish-Portuguese trade rivalry is not relevant to the conditions de las Casas describes in the Caribbean. Choice D is incorrect. Jamestown was not established until 1607, sixty-five years after this document was written.
Question 4. De las Casas's criticisms of Spanish colonial practices most directly contributed to which of the following developments?
Explanation: Choice B is correct. De las Casas's persistent advocacy, including this account submitted directly to King Charles I, was a significant factor in the passage of the New Laws of 1542, which restricted the enslavement of Indigenous peoples and attempted to reform the encomienda system. His moral arguments created political pressure on the Crown to respond to abuses in the colonies. Choice A is incorrect. Spain did not withdraw from its American colonies. De las Casas sought reform of colonial practices, not an end to Spanish colonialism itself. Choice C is incorrect. The Spanish Crown never granted formal political sovereignty to Indigenous rulers. While some protections were extended, Indigenous peoples remained subjects of the Spanish Empire with fewer rights than Spanish colonists. Choice D is incorrect. The encomienda system was never fully abolished; it persisted in modified form well into the seventeenth century despite the New Laws. De las Casas's advocacy produced partial reforms, not complete elimination of the system.
Question 5. The population decline described by de las Casas on the island of Hispaniola was part of a broader pattern that historians associate most directly with
Explanation: Choice A is correct. The varied colonial responses to the Stamp Act, ranging from organized resistance in Massachusetts and Virginia to more muted reactions elsewhere, directly illustrated the regional differences in political culture Holloway describes. Not all colonies responded with equal intensity or in the same way, reflecting the distinct political traditions she identifies. Choice B is incorrect. While the Sons of Liberty did emerge in multiple colonial port cities, the claim that they produced a "unified intercolonial resistance strategy" overstates colonial coordination. The Sons of Liberty were loosely connected groups that acted with considerable independence, and the resistance to the Stamp Act was marked by significant regional variation rather than unified strategy, which is precisely Holloway's point. Choice C is incorrect. The widespread colonial agreement that Parliament lacked the right to tax without representation actually describes a point of colonial unity, which works against Holloway's emphasis on regional differences rather than supporting it. Choice D is incorrect. The Declaratory Act was a British parliamentary response to colonial resistance, not a colonial development that revealed internal regional differences in political culture.