๐Ÿ“ SAT
๐Ÿ“ ACT
๐ŸŽ“ AP Exams

AP Calculus AB: Squeeze Theorem, IVT, and Mixed Limit Skills (Drill 1)

Drill 1 ยท Math ยท Limits and Continuity

0 / 5
Previous drill
Drill 3
Next drill
Drill 5

About This Drill

AP Calculus AB: Squeeze Theorem, IVT, and Mixed Limit Skills (Drill 1) is a Math practice drill covering Limits and Continuity. It contains 5 original questions created by Brian Stewart, a Barron's test prep author with over 20 years of tutoring experience.

Practice applying the Squeeze Theorem to evaluate limits involving bounded functions, use the Intermediate Value Theorem to guarantee the existence of roots and fixed points, and work with piecewise functions and continuity. These AP Calculus AB skills appear on both the multiple-choice and free-response sections.

Questions & Explanations

Question 1. Using the Squeeze Theorem, what is \( \lim_{x \to 0} x^2 \sin\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) \)?

  • A) The limit does not exist.
  • B) \( 1 \)
  • C) \( 0 \) ✓
  • D) \( -1 \)

Explanation: Choice C is correct. Since \( -1 \leq \sin\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) \leq 1 \) for all \( x \neq 0 \), multiplying through by \( x^2 \geq 0 \) gives \( -x^2 \leq x^2\sin\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) \leq x^2 \). As \( x \to 0 \), both \( -x^2 \to 0 \) and \( x^2 \to 0 \), so by the Squeeze Theorem the limit equals 0. Choice A is off because students who notice that \( \sin(1/x) \) oscillates near 0 may conclude the product has no limit, but the \( x^2 \) factor forces the entire expression to zero regardless of the oscillation. Choice B doesn't fit: this confuses the bounded range of \( \sin(1/x) \) with the limit of the full product. Choice D is wrong because while the expression can take negative values, the limit from both sides is 0.

Question 2. The function \( f \) is continuous on \( [1, 5] \) with \( f(1) = -3 \) and \( f(5) = 8 \). Which of the following is guaranteed by the Intermediate Value Theorem?

  • A) There exists \( c \in (1, 5) \) such that \( f(c) = 0 \). ✓
  • B) \( f \) achieves a maximum value on \( [1, 5] \).
  • C) \( f \) is differentiable on \( (1, 5) \).
  • D) There is exactly one value \( c \) in \( (1, 5) \) such that \( f(c) = 0 \).

Explanation: Choice A is correct. The IVT states that if \( f \) is continuous on \( [a, b] \) and \( N \) is any value strictly between \( f(a) \) and \( f(b) \), then there exists at least one \( c \in (a, b) \) with \( f(c) = N \). Since \( f(1) = -3 < 0 < 8 = f(5) \), the value 0 lies between the two output values, so the IVT guarantees at least one root in \( (1, 5) \). Choice B is wrong because that is the conclusion of the Extreme Value Theorem, not the IVT. Choice C doesn't work because continuity does not imply differentiability. Choice D falls short because the IVT guarantees the existence of at least one such value; it says nothing about uniqueness. There could be one root, three roots, or infinitely many.

Question 3. Let \( f \) be defined by \( f(x) = 2x + 1 \) for \( x \leq 1 \) and \( f(x) = x^2 + bx \) for \( x > 1 \). For what value of \( b \) is \( f \) continuous at \( x = 1 \)?

  • A) \( b = -1 \)
  • B) \( b = 1 \)
  • C) \( b = 2 \) ✓
  • D) \( b = 3 \)

Explanation: Choice C is correct. The left-hand limit (and function value) at \( x = 1 \) from the first branch is \( 2(1) + 1 = 3 \). For continuity, the right-hand limit must also equal 3: \( \lim_{x \to 1^+}(x^2 + bx) = 1 + b \). Setting \( 1 + b = 3 \) gives \( b = 2 \). Choice A is off because \( b = -1 \) gives a right-hand limit of \( 1 + (-1) = 0 \), not 3. Choice B doesn't fit: \( b = 1 \) gives a right-hand limit of \( 1 + 1 = 2 \), not 3. Choice D is wrong because \( b = 3 \) gives a right-hand limit of \( 1 + 3 = 4 \), not 3; this error arises from dropping the \( x^2 \) term and treating the right branch as simply \( bx \), then solving \( b(1) = 3 \).

Question 4. A student wants to use the Intermediate Value Theorem to show that \( f(x) = x^3 - 4x + 1 \) has a root on the interval \( [0, 2] \). Which of the following correctly justifies this conclusion?

  • A) \( f(0) = 1 > 0 \) and \( f(2) = 1 > 0 \), so the function must cross zero somewhere in between.
  • B) \( f(0) = 1 \) and \( f(2) = 1 \), and since \( f \) is a polynomial it must equal zero somewhere between 0 and 2 based on the given information.
  • C) \( f(0) = 1 > 0 \) and \( f(1) = -2 < 0 \), so since \( f \) is continuous, there is a root in \( (0, 1) \subset [0, 2] \). ✓
  • D) \( f \) is a polynomial, so it is guaranteed to have at least one real root on any interval.

Explanation: Choice C is correct. \( f(0) = 0 - 0 + 1 = 1 > 0 \) and \( f(1) = 1 - 4 + 1 = -2 < 0 \). Since \( f \) is a polynomial (continuous everywhere), the IVT guarantees that every value between \( f(0) = 1 \) and \( f(1) = -2 \) is attained on \( (0, 1) \). Because \( 0 \) lies between \( -2 \) and \( 1 \), there is a root in \( (0, 1) \subset [0, 2] \). Choice A doesn't fit: \( f(2) = 8 - 8 + 1 = 1 \), so both endpoints give the same positive value. To guarantee that 0 is attained using endpoint data alone, the value 0 must lie strictly between the two output values, which it does not here since both outputs equal 1. Choice B is incorrect for the same reason; equal-sign endpoint values do not guarantee a root between them. Choice D is wrong because polynomials are not guaranteed to have roots on every interval (for example, \( f(x) = x^2 + 1 \) has no real roots on any interval).

Question 5. Suppose \( f \) is continuous on \( [-2, 6] \) with \( f(-2) = 4 \) and \( f(6) = 2 \). Let \( g(x) = f(x) - x \). Which of the following must be true?

(A) There exists \( c \in (-2, 6) \) such that \( f(c) = 3 \).
(B) There exists \( c \in (-2, 6) \) such that \( f(c) = c \).

  • A) Statement (A) only
  • B) Statement (B) only
  • C) There exists \( c \in (-2, 6) \) such that \( f(c) = 0 \).
  • D) Both statements (A) and (B) must be true. ✓

Explanation: Choice D is correct, both statements follow from the IVT. For statement (A): \( f \) is continuous on \( [-2, 6] \) with \( f(6) = 2 < 3 0 \) and \( g(6) = f(6) - 6 = 2 - 6 = -4 < 0 \). Since \( g \) changes sign, the IVT guarantees a \( c \in (-2, 6) \) where \( g(c) = 0 \), meaning \( f(c) = c \), a fixed point. Choice A is incorrect because statement (B) is also guaranteed. Choice B is incorrect because statement (A) is also guaranteed. Choice C is incorrect: the IVT guarantees that \( f \) attains every value in \( [2, 4] \) (between the two output values), and since \( 0 < 2 \), zero lies outside that range and is not guaranteed.